Advanced measurement approach (AMA)

Sponsor's article > Credit risk catches up

When Basel II was first proposed in 1999, credit risk models lagged way behind market risk models. But that's changed, which means we need less prescriptive rules for determining credit risk capital.

A-IRB is overly prescriptive, say US banks

Several US banks would like to see a full internal models-based approach to regulatory capital. According to their response to the Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) on the implementation of the new Basel Capital Accord, the banks said the…

S&P questions Basel II

NEW YORK - Standard and Poor's anticipates significant challenges for banks to quantify operational risk as outlined in Basel II, even though it expresses general support for the Accord as a whole.

RMG leaves Basel II op risk issues unresolved

SAN FRANCISCO - The Risk Management Group (RMG) of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision met in mid-September to attempt to thrash out some key operational risk issues, and review the comments from the third consultative paper (CP3).

Regulator outlines AMA issues for US banks

In a late-July speech at a Risk Waters Group forum on the US's advance notice of proposed rulemaking, the Federal Reserve's Kirk Odegard described how the US would be implementing the advanced measurement approach for op risk, and outlined regulators'…

CP3 Comment: Why be standardised?

It seems such a short time ago that we were building a new capital Accord, which would incentivise banks to improve their risk management and encourage them to move along the spectrum of the new Accord's three stages. How rapidly things can change.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here