End-users and banks seek radical change to Emir reporting

Dual-sided reporting in Europe is not producing accurate data. Banks and corporates say a single-sided approach will help, while also relieving end-users of operational burdens and costs, but some regulators are not convinced

different-ways-shutterstock-229206307
Dual-sided best? Opinion divided over better ways to report

Having spent up to six-figure sums to comply with Europe's derivatives-reporting regime, thousands of end-users may be told they do not need to report after all. They are taking it with a strangely solemn kind of delight; annoyed at the cost, but happy they may be able to pass on the entire obligation to their banks.

"Banks reporting on corporates' behalf is the way forward," says Max Verheijen, managing director of risk management at pensions adviser Cardano in Rotterdam. "Should we move to

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here