![Risk.net](https://www.risk.net/sites/default/files/styles/print_logo/public/2018-09/print-logo.png?itok=1TpHrpuP)
CCP frontloading: the pricing nightmare
From early next year, European derivatives users will have to clear any trades executed between the point a central counterparty is authorised and the date of a clearing obligation determination by the European Securities and Markets Authority, known as the frontloading requirement. But dealers remain confused about how it will work in practice, and the pricing impact it will have for customers. By Fiona Maxwell
![question-mark-puzzle question-mark-puzzle](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/078/107078/question-mark-580x358.jpg.webp?itok=lBGV1hKQ)
Frontloading of derivatives contracts is not the most intuitive of concepts to understand. It sounds like it involves some kind of pre-emptive move, where users are ahead of the curve and take action before it is needed. In reality, it’s a very specific term devised by European legislators, which requires derivatives counterparties to retrospectively clear any transaction executed between the authorisation of a central counterparty (CCP) that clears the product and the start of a formal
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Emir
New Brexit carve-out urged for legacy EU cleared swaps
Risk and default management of grandfathered portfolios required in any clearing relocation plan
Large corporates unconvinced by Emir reporting gift
Corporates ask for opt-out from Emir reporting changes proposed for their benefit
US dealers wade into European CCP relocation debate
CFTC hearing warns of increased margining costs and a pre-Brexit client onboarding crunch
Doubts plague Emir reporting clean-up
Industry still advocates single-sided reporting as a way to improve EU swaps data quality
Emir reporting relief for ETDs causes confusion
Market participants unsure who will report client-side leg of exchange-traded derivatives trades to CCPs
Emir review could push securitisations into the dark
Subjecting deals to margin requirements would be a further blow to STS securitisation concept
Banks win concessions in battle over CCP margin models
European Commission proposal would shine light on clearing house margin charges
Esma wants more detail on CCP recovery plans
Isda AGM: regulator and industry emphasise need for effective clearing house supervision