Risk USA: handling the consequences of reform
Flagship risk event focuses on the post-crisis regulatory universe
This week in New York, over 200 risk management professionals from across the US and around the world gathered at the Marriott Marquis for the 21st annual Risk USA conference.
Discussions focused on the swathe of regulatory reforms brought in since the financial crisis, and on how their implementation will affect the markets. Federal authorities are likely to take a hands-off attitude to two key areas: high-frequency trading and support for central counterparties.
Meanwhile, senior regulators acknowledged the need to keep abreast of changes in risk management practice: the growing use of XVAs and the introduction of speculative position limits will both receive attention in the months ahead. And while new rules are likely to remove the capital advantage swap futures carry, the effort to bring innovation to the swaps market through agency trading has not been a success, the conference heard.
Agency trading 'has not picked up' on Sefs – Tradeweb
Platform says agency volumes are at 0.5% of daily swap trading
Supervisors need to understand XVAs – OCC official
Benhart confirms OCC examiners are looking at valuation adjustments
CFTC to finish position limits rule in 2016, Massad says
Controversial rule on commodity derivatives set to miss year-end target
Fed support high on wish list for buy-side repo clearing
Risk USA panellists want liquidity support for planned new services
Swap futures face loss of capital edge
SA-CCR likely to treat swaps and swap futures equally, says Barclays' Kahn
FSOC in 'no rush' to regulate HFTs
More work to be done in understanding market structure changes, says Pinschmidt
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Complex EU active account reporting could drive trades out of UK
Draft Emir rules might not force large volumes to move to EU, but will make compliance difficult
Capital neutrality key to completing Basel III, says Quarles
Former Republican Fed vice-chair thinks Hill or Bowman could help revive stalled prudential rules
Review of 2024: as markets took a breather, firms switched focus
In the absence of major crises and rules deadlines, financial firms revamped strategy, services and practices
Dora flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side