Regulatory-optimal funding

Funding costs, both for derivatives trading and for more traditional bank lending, are set by treasury functions, which now must consider regulatory requirements such as the Basel III liquidity coverage ratio. But few studies look at how to optimise this process. Chris Kenyon and Andrew Green minimise funding costs based on different models of yield curve dynamics, and show how to outperform hedged funding

techtree1

Trading desks that require funding typically must pay above the risk-free rate. This has led some to add a funding valuation adjustment (FVA) to derivatives prices, and to a heated debate over the legitimacy of this practice (Hull & White 2012). Some firms are now starting to report explicit FVA line items. However, the FVA literature treats the funding curve as an input to the model (Burgard & Kjaer 2011; Morini & Prampolini 2011). This can vary from the firm's senior unsecured debt to

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here