US merger brings uncertain future for BoA/ Fleet FX staff
Bank of America’s (BoA) $47 billion purchase of FleetBoston Financial should bolster its regional US coverage in foreign exchange. But an overlap in jobs is unavoidable with a bank the size of BoA, analysts told RiskNews ' sister publication FX Week , and the outlook is uncertain for staff at both firms.
Bank of America’s forex coverage is also likely to extend to Boston-based mutual funds, said David Gilmore, partner at FX Analytics in Connecticut. It is expected that BoA will not have the risk appetite to take on FleetBoston’s considerable exposure to Latin American markets. Although BoA does still maintain a significant presence in Mexico, it has scaled back its foreign exchange activity in Brazil and Argentina, following last year’s poor performance and volatility.
Outside the US and South America, BoA’s forex group dwarfs FleetBoston’s. In London, it has 60 trading, sales and research staff compared with Fleet’s six. In Asia too, BoA has a greater presence, although Fleet would not give details of its activities in the region.
As yet, no decisions have been made about management in foreign exchange, although BoA’s Ed Brown will continue in his current position as president of global corporate and investment banking following the completion of the deal, the bank said. Staff at both banks were cautiously optimistic regarding the merger. One sales analyst said, "We are very positive but there is mixed confidence over our jobs."
The stock-for-stock transaction is expected to close in the first half of 2004, subject to regulatory approval.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules