US merger brings uncertain future for BoA/ Fleet FX staff
Bank of America’s (BoA) $47 billion purchase of FleetBoston Financial should bolster its regional US coverage in foreign exchange. But an overlap in jobs is unavoidable with a bank the size of BoA, analysts told RiskNews ' sister publication FX Week , and the outlook is uncertain for staff at both firms.
Bank of America’s forex coverage is also likely to extend to Boston-based mutual funds, said David Gilmore, partner at FX Analytics in Connecticut. It is expected that BoA will not have the risk appetite to take on FleetBoston’s considerable exposure to Latin American markets. Although BoA does still maintain a significant presence in Mexico, it has scaled back its foreign exchange activity in Brazil and Argentina, following last year’s poor performance and volatility.
Outside the US and South America, BoA’s forex group dwarfs FleetBoston’s. In London, it has 60 trading, sales and research staff compared with Fleet’s six. In Asia too, BoA has a greater presence, although Fleet would not give details of its activities in the region.
As yet, no decisions have been made about management in foreign exchange, although BoA’s Ed Brown will continue in his current position as president of global corporate and investment banking following the completion of the deal, the bank said. Staff at both banks were cautiously optimistic regarding the merger. One sales analyst said, "We are very positive but there is mixed confidence over our jobs."
The stock-for-stock transaction is expected to close in the first half of 2004, subject to regulatory approval.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk
Critics warn against softening risk transfer rules for insurers
Proposal to cut capital for unfunded protection of loan books would create systemic risk, investors say
Barr defends easing of Basel III endgame proposal
Fed’s top regulator says he will stay and finish the package, is comfortable with capital impact
Bank of England to review UK clearing rules
Broader collateral set and greater margin transparency could be adopted from Emir 3.0, but not active accounts requirement