Merrill Lynch suspends equity derivatives trader
Merrill Lynch has initiated a probe into suspicious activity detected on one of its equity derivatives trading desks, suspending one of the traders at the desk.
The unnamed trader, who worked at a proprietary trading desk in London, is being investigated on suspicion of inflating mark prices on some of the single stock derivatives he traded.
Confirming the matter in an emailed statement, Jezz Farr, a London-based spokesman for the bank, said: “Our preliminary review determined that one desk used marks that appear to be outside of our accepted policy. We have suspended a trader and we continue to review this matter.”
The irregular valuations, which are said to have taken place in April, were flagged by the bank’s risk management system that routinely reviews the marks set by the traders. “This case shows our oversight system works,” said Farr.
This activity brings the bank's risk management system under further scrutiny, as it battles to regain shareholder confidence after racking up losses of about $37 billion in subprime debt-related asset writedowns and credit losses.
Merrill Lynch now joins the ranks of Credit Suisse and Société Générale, which have also been battling problems of rogue trader activity.
Credit Suisse on February 19 revealed a $2.85 billion writedown due to trader mis-markings and pricing errors in structured credit products, just a month after Société Générale stunned the financial markets with a €4.9 billion trading loss due to rogue activity by one of its traders.
See also : €4.9 billion fraud at Société Générale
Credit Suisse reveals $2.85bn subprime credit writedown
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk
Critics warn against softening risk transfer rules for insurers
Proposal to cut capital for unfunded protection of loan books would create systemic risk, investors say
Barr defends easing of Basel III endgame proposal
Fed’s top regulator says he will stay and finish the package, is comfortable with capital impact
Bank of England to review UK clearing rules
Broader collateral set and greater margin transparency could be adopted from Emir 3.0, but not active accounts requirement