Merrill Lynch suffers subprime woes
NEW YORK - US investment bank Merrill Lynch has succumbed to the market crisis created by the subprime mortgage lending crash, losing more than any other bank so far. Merrill announced first $5 billion, increasing the total to $8 billion weeks later, in subprime-related losses, causing unexpected overall third-quarter losses.
On October 5, the bank announced a write-down of $4.5 billion in loans linked to collateralised debt obligations and about $463 million in loans to private equity companies. Merrill's subprime mortgage unit, First Franklin Financial, has already cut operations, branches and jobs in the wake of the meltdown. It boosted the losses to $8 million in late October.
While Merrill claimed to be beginning to see signs of a return to normal market activity, two of its senior bankers had departed - Osmon Semerci, head of Merrill's subprime-laden fixed-income, commodities and currencies division, and Dale Lattanzio, head of the division's US operations.
To make matters worse, Merrill is being sued for fraud and misrepresentation by Metro PCS Communications. The lawsuit rests upon the supposedly low risk and high liquidity investment of assets. The lawsuit was filed over $134 million of Metro's money invested by Merrill brokers, underwritten by the bank and backed by mortgage assets. Metro is the largest US pay-as-you-go mobile phone service provider.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision, along with MarketAxess
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules