Barclays Scrutinised over Terror State Links
NEW YORK & WASHINGTON, DC - The US Department of Justice and the New York District Attorney are investigating UK bank Barclays over suspected breaches of rules over doing business with states accused by the US of sponsoring terror. The bank admitted it has been questioned over dollar payments through its New York branch involving clients from states such as Iran, North Korea, Cuba, Sudan and Syria. The US has prohibited most dollar transactions with clients from these countries as part of its counter-terrorist financing (CTF) efforts.
The ruling marks another tightening up of the rules on European banks operating in the US. In 2005 Dutch bank ABN Amro was fined $80 million for transactions through its New York office that the US government said failed to meet its anti-money laundering (AML) controls.
Barclays warned in its 2007 annual results that the findings of the US investigation "could be substantial". ABN Amro admitted it is still under AML investigation by the Justice Department and negotiating a potentially costly settlement. The reputational risks could be higher than those measures in dollars. UK-based bank HSBC has admitted it maintains a small office in Tehran and that falling foul of US rules would have "serious legal and reputational consequences". Barclays said it was launching its own internal investigation into the US government probe.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk
Critics warn against softening risk transfer rules for insurers
Proposal to cut capital for unfunded protection of loan books would create systemic risk, investors say
Barr defends easing of Basel III endgame proposal
Fed’s top regulator says he will stay and finish the package, is comfortable with capital impact
Bank of England to review UK clearing rules
Broader collateral set and greater margin transparency could be adopted from Emir 3.0, but not active accounts requirement