Citigroup fined by NASD for misleading mutual funds
The National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) has fined Citigroup $1.1 million for failing to prevent its brokers from submitting false information to mutual funds.
The regulator fined Citigroup Global Markets $400,000 for supervisory and record-keeping violations in a ploy by more than 100 of its brokers to improperly obtain waivers of mutual fund sales charges, by falsely claiming that their customers were disabled.
The firm was also ordered to pay $715, 000 in restitution to the affected mutual fund entities.
The misconduct was committed from June 2001 through June 2002. So far, NASD has taken disciplinary action against five Citigroup-registered representatives relating to this misconduct, as investigations into other Citigroup brokers continue.
Citigroup was ordered to review its policies, systems, procedures and training relating to Contingent Deferred Sales Charge (CDSC) waivers in mutual fund transactions.
NASD found that Citigroup's electronic order entry system provided an unsupervised method for its representatives to obtain CDSC waivers for customers.
Citigroup failed to develop any exception reports, or otherwise provide for reasonable steps to ensure registered representatives' compliance with the applicable prospectus terms.
While Citigroup issued a Compliance Memo in 1999 to its managers and directors advising that CDSC waivers could not be granted "except in circumstances specified in the fund prospectus", the firm failed to implement policies or procedures reasonably designed to ensure compliance with this directive.
For one year, Citigroup must also provide a quarterly certification to NASD that it has reviewed all CDSC disability waivers granted, has verified that they were appropriately granted (or corrected those waivers that were not appropriately granted), and has retained required supporting documentation.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU officials tamp down hopes for bank capital relief
Capital cuts are not a done deal in EC’s review of competitiveness, despite US deregulation
EU regulators clash over ceding supervision to Esma
Belgian and Spanish regulators differ on drive for centralised oversight of cross-border firms
Why Trump’s latest Truth should make TradFi twitchy
Wall Street is becoming the villain in US president’s crypto movie
EBA guidance prompts banks to rethink CSRBB perimeters
Banks will likely have to expand their credit spread risk coverage following recommendations
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision