Hackers sell kits on auction site
Hacker toolkits offered for public auction on eBay
LONDON – Hacker toolkits previously restricted to hidden specialist online forums are now being sold openly on global auction sites such as eBay. It marks another disturbing development as the tools of e-crime are becoming far more accessible.
"This is a serious development," says Geoff Sweeney, chief technology officer at IT security firm Tier-3. Until now, novice hackers were required to prove themselves to their peers before getting access to the coveted hacking forums where such kits can be found. Sweeney describes the spread of these kits as “very worrying”.
Their availability on eBay puts complex hacking tools at the disposal of any member of the public with internet access – including stealthy Trojan loaders and website hacking utilities – at the disposal of almost any internet user with a standard eBay and Paypal account. Sales of these kits, although facilitating crime, are legal in most countries. However, there are a growing number of notable exceptions, such as Germany’s ‘anti-hacker’ law.
The tools are usually sold within ethical hacker training courses – legal practice under a contract between company and hacker – whereby the intruder has permission to probe and crack online security systems to highlight weaknesses for improvement. These courses also include educational utilities and certification.
Online crime is growing quickly, with internet fraud figures now outstripping conventional fraud. Companies need to consider extending their security umbrella to protect from the growing number of known and unknown threats to their online enterprises, says Sweeny.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Review of 2024: as markets took a breather, firms switched focus
In the absence of major crises and rules deadlines, financial firms revamped strategy, services and practices
Dora flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk
Critics warn against softening risk transfer rules for insurers
Proposal to cut capital for unfunded protection of loan books would create systemic risk, investors say