CFTC slap $32 million in fines on 'FX swindlers'
In mid-April, the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) granted a permanent injunction against Ronald Steven Holt and three associated companies for financial misdemeanours, while fining them a total of $32 million.
The businesses – the International Funding Association and Global Management Group, from Arizona, and Cambridge Global Group – were fined $32 million.
The fines amount to the settling of a debt that was raised when Holt was initially found guilty of defrauding customers in 2003.
Gregory Mocek, director of the CFTC's division of enforcement, said the case demonstrates the high priority placed on pursuing "foreign currency swindlers" and freezing their assets to give back to retail victims. However, he said customers also need to be aware of the dangers: "Customers should not enter into investments with blindfolds on and expect that everyone in the market-place is legitimate," he said.
The CFTC charged that since 1997, Holt and his businesses fraudulently solicited around $25 million from roughly 2,500 clients for trading futures contracts, including foreign currencies. These included using false claims that he achieved investment returns of 7–10% per month.
The order also found that the defendants traded illegal futures contracts and misappropriated at least $14 million of the clients' $25 million.
The commission said the defendants used the funds to purchase residential property and various items. They were held to be jointly and severally liable to pay a judgment totalling nearly $32 million. This comprises over $14 million for repayment to defrauded customers, around $1.5 million in interest and approximately $16 million in monetary penalties. OR&C
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU officials tamp down hopes for bank capital relief
Capital cuts are not a done deal in EC’s review of competitiveness, despite US deregulation
EU regulators clash over ceding supervision to Esma
Belgian and Spanish regulators differ on drive for centralised oversight of cross-border firms
Why Trump’s latest Truth should make TradFi twitchy
Wall Street is becoming the villain in US president’s crypto movie
EBA guidance prompts banks to rethink CSRBB perimeters
Banks will likely have to expand their credit spread risk coverage following recommendations
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision