BISYS pays $25m to settle SEC financial reporting charges
WASHNGTON DC – The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has settled charges against the BISYS Group for financial reporting, books-and-records, and internal control provision violations.
The Commission's complaint alleges that from July 2000 through December 2003, former BISYS officers and employees engaged in a variety of improper accounting practices that resulted in an overstatement of the company's reported financial results for the fiscal years 2001, 2002, and 2003 by roughly $180 million.
The improper accounting practices were primarily based in the company's insurance services division, but also occurred in other divisions of the company. The SEC complaint alleges that the improper accounting practices were a product of a corporate focus by former management on meeting aggressive, short-term earnings targets and a lax internal control environment.
The SEC claims that BISYS received approximately $20 million in ill-gotten gains as a result of its issuance of convertible debt, stock and options at prices that were inflated as a result of its violations. The improper accounting practices within the insurance services division resulted in an overstatement of BISYS's reported pre-tax earnings by roughly $118 million for the fiscal years between 2001 and 2003. The improper accounting practices in BISYS's other divisions overstated the company's pre-tax earnings for the same period by an additional $60.9 million.
BISYS, a leading provider of financial products and support services, agreed to settle the case, without admitting or denying the Commission's allegations. The company consented to the judgment and agreed to pay approximately $25 million in disgorgement and prejudgment interest.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk
Critics warn against softening risk transfer rules for insurers
Proposal to cut capital for unfunded protection of loan books would create systemic risk, investors say
Barr defends easing of Basel III endgame proposal
Fed’s top regulator says he will stay and finish the package, is comfortable with capital impact
Bank of England to review UK clearing rules
Broader collateral set and greater margin transparency could be adopted from Emir 3.0, but not active accounts requirement