FSA fines Capital One for improper selling of PPI and unfair treatment of customers
LONDON - The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) has fined Capital One Bank £175,000 for failing to have adequate systems and controls for selling Payment Protection Insurance (PPI), and for failing to treat its customers fairly.
Capital One's primary business is providing credit cards, loans and savings accounts, but it also sells PPI on a non-advised basis to its customers during the card application process or via follow-up calls. The FSA investigation focused purely on credit card PPI sales and found that from January 2005 to April 2006, Capital One failed to ensure that 50,000 customers received important information about the policy including all exclusions, although they did receive a policy summary. Affected customers were unable to check what they were covered for or whether the policy was right for them.
Capital One has carried out a full remedial programme to address the systems and controls issues, one part of which ensured that those customers who did not receive the policy document were compensated. The cost of this part, including potential premium refunds and settled claims, is estimated at around £3.0 million, of which £1.1 million related to customers after general insurance regulation started in January 2005.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Capital neutrality key to completing Basel III, says Quarles
Former Republican Fed vice-chair thinks Hill or Bowman could help revive stalled prudential rules
Review of 2024: as markets took a breather, firms switched focus
In the absence of major crises and rules deadlines, financial firms revamped strategy, services and practices
Dora flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk