AIG pays $1.6bn over securities fraud charges New York
American securities regulators have fined American International Group (AIG) $1.6 billion for securities fraud involving improper accounting and bid-rigging.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced the settlement in February in co-ordination with the Office of the New York State Attorney General, the Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York and the US Department of Justice.
AIG will pay the SEC $700 million, as disgorgement and a penalty of $100 million. The insurance giant will also undertake corporate reforms designed to prevent similar misconduct from occurring. The rest of the money will go to the other Federal and state regulators.
The SEC's complaint, filed in federal court in Manhattan on February 9, 2006, alleges AIG's reinsurance transactions with General Re Corporation (Gen Re) were designed to falsely inflate AIG's loss reserves by $500 million to quell analyst criticism that AIG's reserves had been declining.
The complaint also identifies a number of other transactions in which AIG materially mis-stated its financial results through sham transactions and entities created for the purpose of misleading the investing public.
Specifically, the Commission's complaint alleges that in December 2000 and March 2001, AIG entered into two sham reinsurance transactions with Gen Re that had no economic substance but were designed to allow AIG to improperly add a total of $500 million in fabricated loss reserves to its balance sheet in the fourth quarter of 2000 and the first quarter of 2001.
AIG president and chief executive officer Martin Sullivan says: "These settlements are a major step forward in resolving the legal and regulatory issues facing AIG. We have already implemented a wide range of improvements in our accounting, financial reporting and corporate governance, and will continue [to do so]. AIG is committed to business practices that provide transparency and fairness in the insurance markets."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Complex EU active account reporting could drive trades out of UK
Draft Emir rules might not force large volumes to move to EU, but will make compliance difficult
Capital neutrality key to completing Basel III, says Quarles
Former Republican Fed vice-chair thinks Hill or Bowman could help revive stalled prudential rules
Review of 2024: as markets took a breather, firms switched focus
In the absence of major crises and rules deadlines, financial firms revamped strategy, services and practices
Dora flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side