JP Morgan censured by NYSE regulation and fined $150,000
NEW YORK – In mid-June, JP Morgan Securities, based in New York, was censured by NYSE-Euronext's regulatory arm, NYSE Regulation. The authority also imposed a fine of $150,000, and the securities firm consented to the regulatory actions without admitting or denying guilt to findings of inaccurate reserve account and net capital computations and other violations.
A NYSE hearing officer found that from March 2004 through January 2005, the firm experienced difficulties in reconciling accounts following a conversion of its fixed-income processing system from an internal system to a system using an outside vendor. The firm also erroneously concluded that these differences could be treated as bank issues, as opposed to securities clearance issues.
Accordingly, the firm failed to include, when computing its net capital and reserve account requirements, certain aged items that were not paired-off in the reconciliation process.
As a result, the firm experienced a net capital deficiency of approximately $464 million as of March 31, 2004, and a reserve account deficiency of approximately $1.7 billion as of April 16, 2004.
Moreover, following the conversion, some of the firm's books and records were inaccurate because it failed to identify and resolve these unpaired differences on time. In addition, JP Morgan Securities also submitted an inaccurate Key Operational Indicator Report to the NYSE after the conversion, because the firm had reported its reconciliation differences on a net, rather than gross, basis.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos