FSA begins action against irresponsible mortgage lenders
LONDON – According to press reports, the UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) has started enforcement action against five firms it accuses of having weaknesses in responsible lending practices and in their assessment of a customer's ability to afford a mortgage.
The companies – the names of which were not disclosed – were part of a regulatory review of 11 intermediaries and lenders, representing 50% of all subprime mortgage sales. They were initially identified as having to improve in 2005 but failed to do so, the FSA said.
The FSA found that "significant numbers" of people were advised by intermediaries to remortgage their homes, thereby incurring early repayment charges, without the adviser being able to demonstrate that doing so was in the customer's best interests.
It also found in a third of files reviewed, there was an inadequate assessment of customers' ability to afford the mortgage given, and in nearly half of all cases there was inadequate assessment of customers' suitability. It said some lenders failed to monitor the application of their policies, which led to the approval of potentially unaffordable mortgages, adding that some lenders had failed to check the plausibility of customers' information, as required by their own lending policies.
"We are very concerned about these findings. Consumers in the subprime market are vulnerable people who may have high debts or a bad credit history. It is therefore important that they are properly assessed and advised. We will not hesitate to take action where we find bad practice," said Clive Briault, managing director of the FSA's Retail Markets division. "Poor sales practices in this market may lead to serious wider consequences."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs