Monster.com job database comes under attack by phishers
MASSACHUSETTS - Monster.com, one of the world's largest internet recruitment agencies, has been targeted by cybercriminals in a large-scale phishing scam. Using personal information from the Monster.com client database, the hackers posed as potential employers or Monster.com employees to contact clients in a bid to extract their bank account details and passwords.
Details of the breach were discovered only after computer security firm Symantec reported on its website that it had found a new kind of trojan, called Infostealer.Monstres, which had gathered a hoard of 1.6 million personal records stolen from Monster.com and had uploaded them to a remote server on a computer in Ukraine. The trojan only attacked the "Monster for Employers" site, the section used by recruiters and human resources personnel to search for potential candidates, which was probably accessed using the stolen credentials of a Monster.com employee.
On discovery of the attack, Symantec informed Monster.com, which disabled the affected accounts and posted a warning on its online security centre that clients were being sent fraudulent job offers in an attempt to gain access to their financial information. Monster.com has not reported the crime to police and no arrests have been made.
The threat is not yet over for Monster.com as the personal data stored in the database - from potentially several hundred thousand, mainly US-based, people - could also be used to steal personal identities and perpetrate financial fraud. The personal details and the Monster.com name made the phishing scam appeared more genuine than those most online consumers have become used to. The victims were also expecting to be contacted by strangers with job offers as a result of signing up with the recruitment site.
In a statement, the data vaulting and security specialist Cyber-Ark said the data leakage could have been avoided if the site had maintained its database in a secure and encrypted format. Calum Macleod, European director for Cyber-Ark, said: "Modern encryption and digital vaulting techniques mean personal information uploaded to a website like Monster.com need only be decrypted when the database is interrogated. Using this approach means the data can be held securely on the web server and, even if hackers succeeded in downloading the files, the fact that they were encrypted would render the data unreadable - and therefore unusable."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk
Critics warn against softening risk transfer rules for insurers
Proposal to cut capital for unfunded protection of loan books would create systemic risk, investors say
Barr defends easing of Basel III endgame proposal
Fed’s top regulator says he will stay and finish the package, is comfortable with capital impact
Bank of England to review UK clearing rules
Broader collateral set and greater margin transparency could be adopted from Emir 3.0, but not active accounts requirement