US SEC sues Sentinel Management Group over client assets
WASHINGTON - The US Securities and Exchange Commission has begun proceedings against cash-management firm Sentinel Management Group, for allegedly lying to investors and misappropriating their assets.
The firm is accused of fraudulently moving $460 million of client securities from segregated customer accounts to its proprietary house account over a period of seven months. The SEC says Sentinel also pledged customer securities as collateral to obtain a $500 million line of credit facility for its own use.
It maintains that Sentinel commingled client assets without the ability to verify ownership of particular securities by particular clients; and provided false client account statements that did not accurately reflect client portfolio holdings or the fact that securities had been encumbered by the firm.
The SEC said Sentinel's customers suffered undisclosed losses for months before the firm sent them a letter on August 13, claiming it could not return their money without selling their assets at a discounts and incurring losses. The letter also falsely blamed the firm's predicament on the current liquidity crisis. Sentinel filed for bankruptcy four days later.
The US District Court in Chicago entered an order requiring the firm to provide a full accounting of client assets and its own assets and liabilities within five days. Sentinel was also ordered to produce certain brokerage and bank documents immediately, to begin the process of determining client portfolio holdings and ownership of securities. The SEC complaint also seeks a permanent injunction, disgorgement and civil penalties against Sentinel.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk
Critics warn against softening risk transfer rules for insurers
Proposal to cut capital for unfunded protection of loan books would create systemic risk, investors say
Barr defends easing of Basel III endgame proposal
Fed’s top regulator says he will stay and finish the package, is comfortable with capital impact
Bank of England to review UK clearing rules
Broader collateral set and greater margin transparency could be adopted from Emir 3.0, but not active accounts requirement