PWC sues Lehman Bros over European funds removal
LONDON - The administrators for Lehman Brothers' London-based European subsidiary have filed a court order calling for $8 billion in funds to be returned to the UK, after it was removed to the bank's New York central treasury.
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) has been administrating the bank since it filed for bankruptcy in the US on September 15. PwC says the money is needed to pay creditors, salaries, bills and expenses. A PwC spokesman says the return of the bank's hedge fund prime brokerage assets would take several months to conclude. This follows the Japanese Financial Services Authority's move on September 15 to stop Lehman removing remaining assets from the bank's Japanese unit.
Meanwhile, Peter Fleischer, Detlef Leinberger and senior vice-president for risk control Rainer Hartje at German bank KfW have been suspended, after a failed swap deal with Lehman on the morning of its bankruptcy cost the German bank EUR350 million. KfW reportedly transferred EUR350 million to Lehman just hours before the bank filed for US bankruptcy and more than three hours after Lehman warned of its looming insolvency. Lehman's agreed repayment of $500 million in US dollars was never paid. All three have been suspended prior to clarification of the incident.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising