Citigroup Clears The Decks With LSE
LONDON – Citigroup has tightened its internal processes, renegotiated its data licence with the London Stock Exchange, and paid the LSE £6.4 million for under-reporting its data usage, sources told sister publication Inside Market Data in early February.
The settlement, made late last year, covered the unauthorised usage of data from the LSE over a substantial period of time – possibly over the past decade, multiple sources say.
LSE officials decline to comment. "Citigroup highly values our relationship with the LSE and is committed to meeting our contractual obligations with them," says a bank spokesperson.
According to a source familiar with the situation, the LSE's auditing team went into the bank early last year and found "much broader usage than was being claimed and paid for".
No-one is suggesting that Citigroup intended to deliberately defraud the LSE. Instead, the error appears to be due to the growth of algorithmic trading and increased moves away from data terminal business models to open feeds. As a result, real-time data from the LSE and its index subsidiary FTSE was being used in algorithmic trading models, which were then proliferated throughout the organisation and re-used in other models. By all accounts, the bank did not realise that redistributing these models – which contained LSE data – to people not authorised to receive the data constituted a violation of its agreement.
"It just spreads internally like a virus, because no-one is monitoring that the licence is tied to a set number of users," the source says.
Following the discovery, Citigroup and the LSE entered into negotiations to resolve the issue to the satisfaction of both parties, and they finalised the settlement in the fourth quarter of last year, the source says. The bank has also agreed to tighten its controls, and has signed up to a new multi-year agreement with the exchange that includes a redistribution licence. It has also cut back on data usage beyond the number of users allowed by that agreement.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Complex EU active account reporting could drive trades out of UK
Draft Emir rules might not force large volumes to move to EU, but will make compliance difficult
Capital neutrality key to completing Basel III, says Quarles
Former Republican Fed vice-chair thinks Hill or Bowman could help revive stalled prudential rules
Review of 2024: as markets took a breather, firms switched focus
In the absence of major crises and rules deadlines, financial firms revamped strategy, services and practices
Dora flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side