The foreshocks of Brexit
As Brexit chaos continues, energy firms and traders are upping sticks and leaving the UK
The UK is now six months away from its official departure from the European Union, and some unknown period of time away from finally agreeing the terms of departure – if, indeed, that ever happens. That means over the next half-year the entire population of the UK will become increasingly incapable of discussing any other topic and, from us to the rest of the world, apologies in advance for that.
And this month in Energy Risk we look at several points under the broad heading of Brexit risk. Brexit – and other developments as well, such as the growing trade war between the US and pretty much everyone else – are already causing trade routes to realign, and this is creating new demand and new risk for commodity trade financing.
The biggest stumbling block for the Brexit negotiations at present is the still-undetermined status of Northern Ireland and the inter-Irish border – and this is reflected in the energy market as well, with the cross-border energy market under a cloud of uncertainty, which is expanding to cover the UK-continental interconnector market as well.
The Brexit decision, not some uncontrollable crisis of international trade or finance, is now the biggest single near-term risk to the entire UK economy, according to the International Monetary Fund
And many brokers and traders in the energy sector – and elsewhere for that matter – aren’t hanging around to find out the worst – they’re pulling the pins on their worst-case plans and moving out of the UK to more dependable territory elsewhere in Europe.
No-one foresaw this situation: Remain supporters because they never dreamed that Brexit supporters would win; Leave supporters because they had been assured by their leaders that the process of extricating the UK from the EU would be rapid, straightforward and even enjoyable. Now the UK’s energy sector is going through a period of wrenching uncertainty – the Brexit decision, not some uncontrollable crisis of international trade or finance, is now the biggest single near-term risk to the entire UK economy, according to the International Monetary Fund. And, on a larger scale, the apparent US determination to start trade disputes with almost every other country in the world simultaneously isn’t doing much to help either.
The energy and commodity sectors are no stranger to political and particularly geopolitical risk, of course; but the shock with which other markets have reacted to the 2016 resurgence of political risk shows that they may have something to learn from the energy business. The obvious lesson, of course, is one that the energy business internalised long ago: that stability and continuity are not the natural state of political affairs, but a fragile and artificial condition that has to be maintained by the constant effort of people of good will. The natural state of political affairs is chaos.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Our take
Why did UK keep the pension fund clearing exemption?
Liquidity concerns, desire for higher returns and clearing capacity all possible reasons for going its own way
UBS’s Iabichino holds a mirror to bank funding risks
Framing funding management as an optimal control problem affords an alternative to proxy hedging
Trump 2.0 bank supervision: simpler but no soft touch?
Republican FDIC vice-chair Travis Hill wants more focus on financial risk instead of process
Lots to fear, including fear itself
Binary scenarios for key investment risks in this year’s Top 10 are worrying buy-siders
Podcast: Alexei Kondratyev on quantum computing
Imperial College London professor updates expectations for future tech
Quants mine gold for new market-making model
Novel approach to modelling cointegrated assets could be applied to FX and potentially even corporate bond pricing
Thin-skinned: are CCPs skimping on capital cover?
Growth of default funds calls into question clearers’ skin in the game
Quants dive into FX fixing windows debate
Longer fixing windows may benefit clients, but predicting how dealers will respond is tough