Podcast: Alexei Kondratyev on quantum computing

Imperial College London professor updates expectations for future tech

The first time Alexei Kondratyev appeared on Quantcast, he predicted that quantum computers would be commercially available and commonly used by banks within five years.

That was in 2019, when he was leading quantum computing research at Standard Chartered – a position in which he had a unique vantage point to assess the technologies being developed by vendors and their potential applications.

While the first part of Kondratyev’s prediction was mostly correct – banks now have access to quantum computing services from several vendors – the second part has proven overly optimistic.

In this episode of Quantcast, Kondratyev – now a visiting professor at Imperial College London and a researcher at the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) Lab – makes a new prediction.

 

“I think in five years, we should probably see business processes in the production environment being executed partially on quantum computers,” he says. “And my prediction would be that it will happen through classical supercomputers, working in parallel with quantum processors, outsourcing some function calls to QPUs,” he says.

Kondratyev, together with David Garvin and Marco Paini of Rigetti Computing, and his former ADIA colleague Alex Lipton, recently published a paper showing how a quantum algorithm can classify probability distributions better than  classical computers. 

Classifying probability distributions is a common problem in finance. It comes up, for example, when testing the performance of investment strategies in-sample versus out-of-sample. The goal is to answer the question: do the two samples come to the same multivariate probability distribution or are they distinct? The process is more difficult than it sounds.

“This is very complex multivariate analysis,” explains Kondratyev. The difficulty lies in choosing from a wide range of possible models – each with its own pros and cons – to represent the features of the distribution. “Therefore, it was very interesting and tempting to see if we could address this problem and formulate a quantum [algorithm] to sample test that can help us to classify multivariate distributions,” he says.

With a classical algorithm, the dimensionality of the problem scales quadratically with the size of the dataset, making it intractable for large datasets. With a quantum algorithm, the dimensionality scales linearly. And while large datasets are not the norm in finance, the quantum algorithm may prove useful to those working with high-frequency data.

Kondratyev explains how their quantum algorithm can be applied to this problem by encoding datasets into corresponding density matrixes – the mathematical descriptions of quantum systems. The algorithm can then efficiently calculate the distances between the two probability distributions.

The results detailed in the paper show that, in addition to being able to handle larger datasets, the quantum algorithm reaches conclusions with a higher degree of confidence.

Kondratyev’s work stands in stark contrast to the bulk of papers on quantum computing, which seem to apply super-fast algorithms to ad hoc problems that are of no practical value – a bugbear of Kondratyev’s. He describes newly unveiled Google’s Willow processor as “totally useless”.

“It’s a specially constructed problem,” he says of the benchmarks used to test Willow, describing them as “potentially interesting if you want to characterise your quantum processor, but with absolutely no application in any field of human activity”.

Looking ahead, Kondratyev believes the future of computing is hybrid. “Quantum processors will be working together in parallel with classical supercomputers, with hybrid computational protocols that would outsource some complex function calls to quantum processors, but most of the protocol will be executed classically,” he says.   

Index:

00:00 Introduction

02:25 Classification of probability distributions

08:00 Classifying distributions with a quantum algorithm

11:30 Crash course in quantum computing

15:20 Comparison between the quantum algorithm over a classical one

21:10 Results of the experiment

23:00 The collaboration among the authors

28:00 Practical uses of quantum computing

35:31 The state of art of the technology

39:40 Upcoming projects

42:15 Where will it be in five years

To hear the full interview, listen in the player above, or download. Future podcasts in our Quantcast series will be uploaded to Risk.net. You can also visit the main page here to access all tracks, or go to Spotify, Amazon Music or the iTunes store to listen and subscribe.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here