FMIs get busy, as supervisors circle

Via new roles and controls, exchanges and clearers hope to “get ahead” of regulatory wave

Jump to: Risk appetite | Organisation and staffing | Controls | Reporting | Mini-methodology

In the old days, cash and futures markets were littered with exchanges and clearing houses. Often, exchanges owned their own clearing house. They were important structures, but also fairly simple ones. The markets they served tended to be constrained by geography, asset class and instrument.

Today’s financial market infrastructures (FMIs) are a different beast – larger, more complex, offering a range of

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here