Jump to: Organisation and staffing | Risk controls | Modelling | Scenario analysis | Mini-methodology
If a bank is big – that is, really big – can it shrug off the attentions of its regulators? Can it swat away warnings like cattle swat away flies? Can it ignore fines and penalties like a whale ignores the bite of a lamprey?
This is what some regulators fear, according to a senior operational risk executive with one global systemically important bank (G-Sib), who participated in this year’s
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulatory compliance
FMIs get busy, as supervisors circle
Via new roles and controls, exchanges and clearers hope to “get ahead” of regulatory wave
Barking bank watchdogs don’t need to bite
Regional banks add staff, layer up controls to mitigate compliance risks
No tick-the-box approach to compliance risks
G-Sibs share fear of regulatory run-ins, but lack common stance on modelling, KRIs and more