![Risk.net](https://www.risk.net/sites/default/files/styles/print_logo/public/2018-09/print-logo.png?itok=1TpHrpuP)
The IM ‘big bang’ – Not quite plain sailing
The ‘IM big bang’ has been a long time in the making and has radically altered in range since inception. Initially intended to catch all entities with outstanding derivatives notional of €8 billion and above, this fifth wave of compliance has been split in two and delayed by a year. It means firms with less than €50 billion of derivatives notional will not be caught in the net until September 2022
![Risk_IM21_OFC](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/2021-06/GettyImages-186660266-1191680108.jpg.webp?itok=gby98Qtw)
The derivatives notionals have been totted up, in-scope entities determined, and now an estimated 250 firms are scrambling to calculate, exchange and segregate initial margin (IM) on their non-cleared derivatives trades from September 1.
The ‘IM big bang’ has been a long time in the making and has radically altered in range since inception. Initially intended to catch all entities with outstanding derivatives notional of €8 billion and above, this fifth wave of compliance has been split in two and delayed by a year. It means firms with less than €50 billion of derivatives notional will not be caught in the net until September 2022.
An additional reprieve from global regulators means counterparties with margin exchange amounts below €50 million (or local equivalents) can defer the legal and documentation effort. Acadia – formerly AcadiaSoft – reckons around half of the entities caught in the phase five net will be required to post margin from day one.
By moving some lower-margin in-scope portfolios to so-called ‘threshold monitoring’, BlackRock has cut its immediate phase five repapering requirement by one-quarter. “It has been certainly of benefit for us and, going into phase six, we see this becoming even more of a benefit,” said Mark Persiani, a director for collateral management at BlackRock, on a Risk.net webinar in May.
It’s a welcome step towards avoiding the kind of regulatory bottleneck that dogged the first wave of compliance. “It will save the industry a large amount of time and cost without distracting from the policy goals,” said Ryan Winnett, programme director for uncleared margin rules at Barclays, on the webinar.
With its extended prep time and scaled-down cohort, phase five should be plain sailing. In reality, it’s likely to be the usual scramble for the finish line.
For a start, the 120 firms estimated to be exchanging margin on September 1 are nearly double the total number of entities caught in phases one to four combined.
What’s more, the 12-month delay granted by regulators in response to Covid-19 disruption was widely squandered. Many firms downed tools on negotiating complex and unwieldy legal documents, risking an all-too familiar 11th-hour rush.
Firms hoping for a rollback of burdensome model governance requirements – which apply to the buy side in Europe but not in the US – have been disappointed by the slow emergence of new regulatory technical standards. Under current European Union rules, all in-scope entities must seek approval from their national competent authority to calculate margin exchange amounts using the industry’s standard initial margin model, or Simm.
At this late stage, firms must plan “as if they’ll be subject to the full model approval on ongoing governance obligations, pending any alternative guidance from their local supervisory authority,” said Craig Pearson, co-founder and director of Margin Tonic, also speaking on the webinar.
There are other outstanding cross-border complications. In the EU, money market funds (MMFs) posted as collateral must be Ucits-compliant. In the US, Ucits MMFs are not eligible collateral for regulatory IM. It means counterparties falling under multiple regimes may not have any MMFs that constitute eligible collateral. It’s not necessarily a huge problem for phase five, says Persiani, but soon could be.
“Luckily we don’t have portfolios looking to use MMFs, but this will be more of a phase six issue. We have a bit of time to hopefully get the regulators to iron out the kinks in the process.”
The 900 or so firms expected to be caught in September 2022 might be best advised to have a backup plan, just in case.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
EU banks lose relief on model test after FRTB delay
Deferment of new trading book regime to January 2025 eats into transition period for “erratic” P&L attribution test
Sunday night football and the Basel III endgame
Big banks, political advocates and housing organisations are unlikely allies in race to dropkick new capital regime
Futures exchanges seek clarity on China licensing regime
Hazy details on landmark Futures and Derivatives Law breeds legal uncertainty, unnerving operators
Some EU banks wanted option to start FRTB on time
Representatives of member states raised possibility with European Commission at July meeting discussing the delay
For US Treasury troubles, treat the cause not the symptom
Regulatory alarm about hidden risk in the Treasury futures market misses the point, fund association execs write
Iosco delays pre-hedging consultation to November
Review into controversial practice splits industry
Honey, I shrunk the Fed. (Not a sci-fi fantasy)
Promoting the discount window may be the Fed’s key to shrinking its $7trn balance sheet, says Bill Nelson