![Risk.net](https://www.risk.net/sites/default/files/styles/print_logo/public/2018-09/print-logo.png?itok=1TpHrpuP)
The Giancarlo spirit: wobbling but not falling
The burden of US extraterritoriality rules may be easing
Three years ago, the then-chairman of the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Christopher Giancarlo, embarked on a tour of Asia, during which he apologised for the over-zealous extraterritoriality rules the agency had been responsible for over the years, and promised to do something about them.
This stance drove a sharp drop in the basis between LCH and the Japan Securities Clearing Corporation, as the market realised US clients might now be allowed to choose on which platform they clear swaps. The JSCC is not fully registered with the CFTC, whilst the LCH is.
But the market is still waiting.
The latest setback came towards the end of last year, when some commissioners at the CFTC voted against a proposal that would have allowed US customers to clear at those firms that do not yet have CFTC derivatives clearing organisation status.
Dan Berkovitz was one of these commissioners. In his dissenting opinion, he said: “The proposal would jeopardise US customers, create systemic risks to the US financial system, promote the use of foreign intermediaries at the expense of US firms, and exceed this agency’s limited exemptive authority.”
Why, argued Berkovitz, should US entities be subject to the whims of a foreign bankruptcy regime over which their home regulator has no direct jurisdiction?
It’s not an unreasonable point to make – but it is one that now demands a solution.
There are clear benefits for US customers to be able to clear some of their trades, especially long-dated yen swaps, at JSCC since this is where the bulk of liquidity sits.
Of course, the blame shouldn’t sit entirely with the CFTC. The Japanese Financial Services Agency (JFSA) has also not shied away from market protectionism, most notably in refusing to allow the LCH to trade Japanese yen swaps onshore (although the UK firm does have permission to trade non-yen swaps in the country).
While officials at the JFSA are happy to denounce the ills of market fragmentation, they have repeatedly ducked the question of whether the LCH will ever be granted a licence for clearing yen swaps onshore. Were this to happen, then the problem of US entities not being able to clear at the JSCC would be lessened.
Such national protectionism is, perhaps, understandable. The fear is that, should the LCH be granted a yen clearing licence in Japan, then liquidity will suddenly jump off the JSCC – and the JFSA can’t let that happen to their national clearing house.
But solutions need to be found, which is why it is heartening to see that Rostin Behnam, acting chairman for the CFTC, has indicated discussions will continue.
US President Joe Biden has yet to nominate the next chair of the CFTC, but whoever it is should keep up the momentum that is already in place to ease the burden of US extraterritoriality rules. Financial markets are inherently cross-border in nature. They need a legal framework that matches.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Our take
Can history resolve factor investors’ p-hacking questions?
Quants seek reassurance in the far distant past
Insurance double-hatters like Apollo can expect more scrutiny
Regulators are homing in on conflicts of interests at private-equity-owned insurers
Podcast: Lorenzo Ravagli on why the skew is for the many
JP Morgan quant proposes a unified framework for trading the volatility skew premium
Quants see promise in DeBerta’s untangled reading
Improved language models are able to grasp context better
Counterparty risk model links defaults to portfolio values
Fed’s Michael Pykhtin proposes using copula models to capture effects of margin calls on default risk
Does Basel’s internal loss multiplier add up?
As US agencies mull capital reforms, one regulator questions past losses as an indicator of future op risk
Is JSCC-CFTC stalemate about to be broken?
Japan CCP gains allies in battle to clear yen swaps for US clients, but CFTC shakeup could dash hopes
What T+1 risk? Dealers shake off FX concerns
Predictions of increased settlement risk and later-in-the-day trading have yet to materialise