Strict hedge fund rules in Korea hinder market growth
The newly born Korean hedge fund market has made swift progress – but regulatory obstruction makes it difficult for funds to get both clients and prime brokers
Following a three-year gestation period, the Korean hedge fund market burst into life on December 23, 2011. By the end of February 2012, 12 Korean managers had registered 17 funds with a total of $500million of assets under management – and market observers are bullish there is much more to come.
The Korea Institute of Finance estimates that total assets under management (AUM) could hit 13 trillion won ($11.5 billon) in the next two years – on a par with the Japanese market, which has had two decades to reach that level. Given the country’s status as Asia’s third-largest economy and predictions of continued growth, this surely means South Korea is on the radar for international banks looking for new sources of income for their prime brokerage businesses.
Not so, says one senior Asian prime broker: just as South Korea’s hedge fund market took four years to emerge from a regulatory cul-de-sac, the supervisors have erected barriers to entry around the market, making it difficult for non-local players to participate. “It’s as if you create a Korean F1 race with all the cars made by Korean manufacturers with just Korean drivers racing on a Korean circuit,” he says.
According to Warren Park, senior analyst at Hana Institute of Finance in Seoul, the issue has much to do with the need to establish few, but stronger, players among the domestic finance sector. He cites as an example stipulations from the domestic regulator, the Financial Services Commission, that prime brokers must hold 3 trillion won of capital. According to Park this figure is “quite arbitrary” from a risk management perspective, but that it has been set at that level so that “the top three or four firms can raise that much capital”.
A strong regulatory framework has been a feature of the Korean hedge fund market from when it was first mooted in 2008. Then it was stipulated that at least 50% of the assets of onshore private placement funds had to be invested in distressed companies in the wake of the financial crisis. Unsurprisingly no hedge funds were established.
The Financial Services Commission (FSC), the domestic regulator, then set up another task force in 2010 and arrived at a new set of guidelines enacted in September last year. On the plus side for potential hedge funds, the 50% rule was removed but several others were added that meant significant amounts of cash would be needed to set up or invest in a fund.
Investors must stake a minimum investment of 500 million won ($450,000), while securities firms wishing to set up a fund must have 1 trillion won in capital, and asset managers 10 trillion won in AUM. According to the FSC, it looked at regulations on size, capacity, manpower and reputation in order to limit risk in the hedge fund industry.
Prime brokers don’t escape either. A firm wishing to enter the Korean market in order to service local hedge funds needs 3 trillion won of capital – a high figure for domestic firms and one that effectively excludes their international peers from the market altogether, says Park. “International firms would need to register as a fully registered subsidiary so effectively offshore prime brokers are excluded because this would require ringfencing all that capital within Korea. The regulator would like to see that they participate indirectly by working with a local securities firm,” he says
And unlike most markets, funds can’t use prime brokers from their own firm, so Samsung can’t use its own prime broker to service its hedge fund. David Bennett, in prime services sales at Barclays Capital in Singapore, says this is to avoid perceived conflicts of interest over financing rates by prime brokers to their affiliate hedge funds.
These rules contrast with the way prime brokers usually operate internationally. Hannah Goodwin, regional head of prime brokerage Asia-Pacific at Citi in Hong Kong, says: “It is closed off to non-Korean service providers at this point which is different to any other place. Most international prime brokers run their business off a London entity and so a Singaporean hedge fund will still interact with an international prime broker.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU trade repository matching disrupted by Emir overhaul
Some say problem affecting derivatives reporting has been resolved, but others find it persists
Barclays and HSBC opt for FRTB IMA
However, UK pair unlikely to chase approval in time for Basel III go-live in January 2026
Foreign banks want level playing field in US Basel III redraft
IHCs say capital charges for op risk and inter-affiliate trades out of line with US-based peers
CFTC’s Mersinger wants new rules for vertical silos
Republican commissioner shares Democrats’ concerns about combined FCMs and clearing houses
Adapting FRTB strategies across Apac markets
As Apac banks face FRTB deadlines, MSCI explores the insights from early adopters that can help them align with requirements
Republican SEC may focus on fixed income – Peirce
Commissioner also wants a revival of finders’ exemption, more guidance for UST clearing
Streamlining shareholding disclosure compliance
Shareholding disclosure compliance is increasingly complex due to a global patchwork of regulations and the challenge of managing vast amounts of data
Banks take aim at Gruenberg’s brokered deposit rule
Regulatory lawyers question need to reverse 2020 rulemaking just four years later