Enterprise Inns-censes investors
Moody’s decision to put Enterprise Inns on review for downgrade caused consternation among sterling investors who had bought the pub company’s debenture issues, a form of secured debt.
The rating agency’s main concern was the level of refinancing risk associated with Enterprise Inns (rated Ba2) exercising its option to buy the 83% of the Unique Pub Company that it does not already own. The threat of the debentures moving to sub-investment grade from Baa3, and thus triggering forced sellers, threw spreads out by around 35bp.
Michael Markham, fund manager at Investec, disagreed with Moody’s decision on the debentures. “We like it as a concept, but the rating agencies do not give it the necessary uplift,” he says.
He points to the added security assurances, such as over-collateralisation, the business being cash generative and the ability to pledge more assets if necessary to maintain the firm’s income and coverage ratios, as factors supporting a higher rating for the debentures. According to Moody’s, only two notches can separate a company’s corporate rating and its secured debt.
The company’s announcement that it would finance the Unique acquisition through debt also incensed bondholders. “We are disappointed they took this action as we were under the impression that Enterprise would fund the final purchase under equity and debt,” he says.
Ultimately the transaction will require both board and shareholder approval, but Ted Tuppen, Enterprise’s chief executive officer, said in a conference call last month that he intends “to move heaven and earth” to live up to his commitment of keeping his rating investment grade.
Investec’s Markham believes that the issue could be positively resolved for bondholders. “Enterprise needs the debt markets; they are an appropriate way to fund their business,” he says.
Andrew Burton, credit analyst at Royal Bank of Scotland, also has a positive view on events, but warns that the Moody’s rating panel, which ultimately makes the decision, could throw a spanner in the works.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Review of 2024: as markets took a breather, firms switched focus
In the absence of major crises and rules deadlines, financial firms revamped strategy, services and practices
Dora flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk
Critics warn against softening risk transfer rules for insurers
Proposal to cut capital for unfunded protection of loan books would create systemic risk, investors say