Natwest three to be extradited to the us on fraud charges
GREENWICH, CONNECTICUT – Three former UK bankers will be extradited to the US to stand trial for defrauding Greenwich NatWest, a Connecticut-based subsidiary of NatWest, which is now part of Royal Bank of Scotland, of some £4.2 million by investing in an off-balance sheet Enron partnership.
David Bermingham, Gary Mulgrew and Giles Darby – all former investment bankers with NatWest in London – had appealed to the High Court in the UK to overturn the extradition order made by a Bow Street district judge. The order had also been confirmed by Charles Clark, the Home Office minister, last year.
The three have fallen foul of a new extradition treaty negotiated by Prime Minister Tony Blair in 2003, in which the US simply has to allege that an "extraditable" offence has been committed to justify a request for an extradition – that is, an offence that carries a maximum prison sentence of at least one year. The US Congress has not ratified the US-side of the bargain, however, so the UK still has to submit supporting evidence for any of its extradition requests.
The three are accused of advising their employer to sell part of a stake in an Enron business for much less than that stake was worth in 2000. Then, the three left NatWest, bought into the business that had been sold, and resold it for more money, pocketing about £1.5 million each.
Critics point out that the three bankers worked for a British bank at the time, are British citizens, and their 'victim' was a British bank. Also, the Serious Fraud Office has declined to investigate the matter. The three are now appealing to the House of Lords, the UK equivalent of the US Supreme Court.
The US authorities, who uncovered the transaction during their inquiries into the collapse of power company Enron, are planning on charging the three with seven counts of illegally gaining money through international banking systems.
According to legal sources, several other UK executives are watching this case nervously, as there are potential extradition requests in process as well. The three face up to 35 years in a maximum security prison in the US, and will have to pick up their own legal costs, even if acquitted.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk
Critics warn against softening risk transfer rules for insurers
Proposal to cut capital for unfunded protection of loan books would create systemic risk, investors say
Barr defends easing of Basel III endgame proposal
Fed’s top regulator says he will stay and finish the package, is comfortable with capital impact
Bank of England to review UK clearing rules
Broader collateral set and greater margin transparency could be adopted from Emir 3.0, but not active accounts requirement