US Fed bails out AIG with $85bn
NEW YORK - US insurance firm AIG - which controls more than a trillion dollars of assets - has been taken under the control of the Federal Reserve. The Fed provided an $85 billion bailout on September 16 after the institution's share price plummeted amid mounting liquidity problems. US President Bush said the move was necessary "to promote stability in the financial markets". It came only a week after the nationalisation of mortgage lenders Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, and only a day after US authorities allowed investment bank Lehman Brothers to file for bankruptcy. Under the plan, authorities will receive equity equivalent to a 79.9% stake in AIG. In return, the insurer receives a two-year bridge loan of $85 billion to keep it afloat until it can dispose of billions of dollars in assets. AIG's liquidation could cause more than $180 billion of losses for financial institutions, reportedly leaving European banks particularly exposed.
Some blame the EU Basel II capital requirements regulation for AIG's increased exposure. As well as direct exposure to an array of credit default swaps on the insurer's books, AIG also carried extensive exposure from banks, as Basel II encourages banks to insure their exposure to structured products, allowing them to carry less capital. Basel II says: "A bank will be allowed to recognise the risk-mitigating impact of insurance in the measures of operational risk used for regulatory minimum capital requirements". The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has yet to conclude changes to its capital rules to offset structured products.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk
Critics warn against softening risk transfer rules for insurers
Proposal to cut capital for unfunded protection of loan books would create systemic risk, investors say
Barr defends easing of Basel III endgame proposal
Fed’s top regulator says he will stay and finish the package, is comfortable with capital impact
Bank of England to review UK clearing rules
Broader collateral set and greater margin transparency could be adopted from Emir 3.0, but not active accounts requirement