Higher insurance premiums for structured products make RDR compliance difficult

Some professional indemnity insurers are charging higher premiums for structured products or are refusing to cover them. This makes it difficult for IFAs to offer them to their clients

ian-lowes
Ian Lowes, Lowes Financial Management

Some professional indemnity (PI) insurers in the UK are charging higher premiums or refusing to cover structured products, which they consider to be risky investments, which is causing problems for independent financial advisers (IFAs) and hindering their efforts to comply with theFSA’s 2012 Retail Distribution Review (RDR).

“[The problem] first came to the fore around 2003 after the precipice bond issue,” says Ian Lowes, managing director of Lowes Financial Management, a Newcastle-based IFA.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here