Podcast: Claudio Albanese on how bad models survive
Darwin’s theory of natural selection could help quants detect flawed models and strategies
At almost every financial firm, there will be some models that are unfit for purpose. But how do flawed models manage to exist for so long?
Claudio Albanese, founder and head of development at Global Valuation – and our guest for this episode of Quantcast – thinks Darwin’s theory of evolution may offer some insight into that question.
For his latest study, Albanese, together with Stéphane Crépey at Université de Paris and Stefano Iabichino of JP Morgan, adapted Darwin’s principles to show how low-quality models that overvalue and overhedge structured products can survive – and even thrive – in the short term.
Because traders can sometimes profit by overhedging certain derivatives structures, they may be incentivised to overlook the weaknesses of particular models. The trade-off is that they will end up taking long-term risks that are unaccounted for by the models, potentially leading to painful losses.
As an example, Albanese and his co-authors show the effect of using low-quality models to price range accruals – an exotic structured product with a fraught history. But their findings are relevant to other derivatives too – in particular, those with embedded callability.
Albanese argues a Darwinian lens may help banks detect bad models and inefficient hedging strategies – and avoid the dangerous exposures they create.
This foray into model risk is a departure for Albanese, who is known for his contributions to the study of derivatives valuation adjustments. On that topic, he shares his thoughts on the concept of a hedging valuation adjustment, which was recently introduced by Ben Burnett at Barclays and calls for it to be expanded beyond transaction costs.
That might be a subject for another podcast.
Index
00:00 Intro
02:50 Motivation for the model risk study
05:25 Range accruals case study
09:30 The risk of overhedging
13:10 Visualising model risk as it materialises
17:15 The connection between natural selection and derivatives models
21:15 What products are potentially affected by flawed pricing models?
25:00 Future research
To hear the full interview, listen in the player above, or download. Future podcasts in our Quantcast series will be uploaded to Risk.net. You can also visit the main page here to access all tracks, or go to the iTunes store or Google Podcasts to listen and subscribe.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Cutting Edge
Rethinking P&L attribution for options
A buy-side perspective on how to decompose the P&L of index options is presented
Volatility shape-shifters: arbitrage-free shaping of implied volatility surfaces
Manipulating implied volatility surfaces using optimal transport theory has several applications
Georgios Skoufis on RFRs, convexity adjustments and Sabr
Bloomberg quant discusses his new approach for calculating convexity adjustments for RFR swaps
Infrequent MtM reduces neither value-at-risk nor backtesting exceptions
Frequency of repricing impacts volatility and correlation measures
Dynamic margining long/short equity trading strategies
A repo haircut model extends a previous solution for long-only strategies
SABR convexity adjustment for an arithmetic average RFR swap
A model-independent convexity adjustment for interest rate swaps is introduced
Joint S&P 500/VIX smile calibration in discrete and continuous time
An arbitrage-free model for exotic options that captures smiles and futures is presented
The carbon equivalence principle: minimising the cost to carbon net zero
A method to align incentives with sustainability in financial markets is introduced
Most read
- Industry urges focus on initial margin instead of intraday VM
- For a growing number of banks, synthetics are the real deal
- Did Fed’s stress capital buffer blunt CCAR?