Merrill Lynch to offer algorithmic engine to buy-side

Merrill Lynch is slated to join a growing array of major sell-side firms that will allow third-party access to their algorithmic trading engines.

To provide links to its ML X-ACT algorithmic trading service, Merrill Lynch is partnering with vendor Portware, which will provide the Merrill Lynch link as a standard option for its Portware Professional trade management system.

The new access will appeal to quantitative asset managers, fund managers as well as new and established hedge funds. Goldman Sachs and Credit Suisse First Boston (CSFB) have also signed on with Portware to offer the buy side new access to their algorithmic engines.

Not all major firms have gone public with their third-party access to algorithmic engines, said Ary Khatchikian, president and chief technology officer of Portware. "We support a lot more than three venues."

Officials at Portware said they provide algorithmic access to approximately 10 major firms.

The agreement with Portware is an acknowledgment of what the firm has been able to do for a while, says Mike Stewart, a managing director and head of global portfolio and automated trading at Merrill Lynch. The firm provided FIX connectivity to ML X-ACT for internal groups via third-party order management systems and directly to clients that have established their own FIX connectivity, Stewart said.

Launched in the third quarter of 2003, ML X-ACT is a high-level algorithmic engine that exploits real-time and historical market data feeds. The engine has had continual updates since then. "We think of algorithmic trading as another sector. It's really an evolution of a trading effort that's always been there," Stewart said.

High profile moves by Merrill Lynch and others will improve the appeal of algorithmic trading, according to analysts at market researcher TowerGroup. Evolving financial markets and enthusiasm for electronic trading are also making algorithmic trading more attractive, according to a new TowerGroup report.

"Fragmentation of liquidity and lower commission price points are driving the buy side towards the use of algorithms, while institutional brokers are looking to the same new tools to lower their trading costs to support those reduced commissions," says Gavin Little-Gill, a TowerGroup analyst, in a prepared statement.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Chartis RiskTech100® 2024

The latest iteration of the Chartis RiskTech100®, a comprehensive independent study of the world’s major players in risk and compliance technology, is acknowledged as the go-to for clear, accurate analysis of the risk technology marketplace. With its…

T+1: complacency before the storm?

This paper, created by WatersTechnology in association with Gresham Technologies, outlines what the move to T+1 (next-day settlement) of broker/dealer-executed trades in the US and Canadian markets means for buy-side and sell-side firms

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here