Business managers play key role in shrinking Merrill IT budget

Merrill Lynch has stemmed IT cost overruns by shifting the responsibility for technology project costs to business managers and away from IT managers.

“In 1999, 34% of the technology budget was owned by the business side, and the balance was owned by technology groups,” said Marvin Balliet, chief financial officer of the global technology and services division of Merrill Lynch, during his Thursday morning presentation at Waters Magazine’s 2002 Financial and Risk Management Technology Congress at the New York Palace Hotel. “Now, 79% is owned by the business and the remainder is owned by technology groups.”

Under the new strategy, technology budgets are kept in check because business managers are required to make cuts in other areas if they want to increase technology spend.

“Cut the number of traders, or don’t move into new offices if you want to increase spending, but don’t go over budget,” Balliet says.

That said, the company is encouraging business managers to cut IT costs without deferring projects that have potential for offering competitive advantage. The firm’s IT spending strategy is to “shrink the overall [IT spending] pie but maximise strategic investment,” says Balliet.

Other savings came from a policy of increased oversight. In particular, projects are generally restricted in length to 18 months, and reviewed quarterly (in some cases monthly) to ensure they are on budget and still pertinent to current market conditions.

“The day of the massive five-year project is dead,” Balliet said, noting that those technology projects would often run over budget and continue well after they were no longer relevant to the market.

The company has also found cost savings by shifting some of its IT development work oversees, to “offshore development centers”. In particular, Merrill Lynch has a relationship with an IT development firm in India that has helped reduce its labour costs. Labour generally represents about 60% of an IT budget, Balliet says.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Chartis RiskTech100® 2024

The latest iteration of the Chartis RiskTech100®, a comprehensive independent study of the world’s major players in risk and compliance technology, is acknowledged as the go-to for clear, accurate analysis of the risk technology marketplace. With its…

T+1: complacency before the storm?

This paper, created by WatersTechnology in association with Gresham Technologies, outlines what the move to T+1 (next-day settlement) of broker/dealer-executed trades in the US and Canadian markets means for buy-side and sell-side firms

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here