AIB fraud involved fake entries in SunGard's Devon

Allied Irish Banks' John Rusnak, the trader accused of concealing $691 million in foreign exchange losses over five years, inputted false trades into SunGard's Devon System, which was used to process prime-brokerage accounts at Allfirst Financial, the bank's US subsidiary, according to an AIB-backed inquiry.

The inquiry, conducted by Eugene Ludwig and law firm Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, did not fault the Devon System's technology, but referred to abuses of the software and the bank's risk and audit processes.

Rusnak entered false forex forwards into Devon to manipulate the apparent open forex position used to calculate value-at-risk. Internal audits apparently did not detect the abuses, the report said.

The Devon System was first licensed by Allfirst 10 years ago, and neither AIB nor Allfirst elected to upgrade to recent product versions. Devon is usually updated every year, claimed Clare Porter, vice-president of SunGard Trading and Risk Systems, which includes Devon. The issue at Allfirst was not related to technology but to operational deficiencies, Porter said.

Devon, which produces an audit trail and keeps track of the lifecycle of trades as they are booked, amended or cancelled, has administrative log-on controls that admit only certain users and activities for each user, as well as a user-defined password change frequency. It also keeps track of any change to any field and the user associated with those changes, Porter said.

"Devon has comprehensive controls in place that work in conjunction with risk policies or procedures," she said. "The vast majority of our clients have built the system into their processing environment. But technology is only as good as the processing environment around it."

About 250 banks use the Devon system. Porter said SunGard had not experienced any unusual spike in client questions related to the Allfirst scandal.

Rusnak had dealings with at least two other derivatives and risk management vendors – DerivaTech and GFInet/Fenics – but declined to purchase any of their products allegedly due to cost reasons.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Chartis RiskTech100® 2024

The latest iteration of the Chartis RiskTech100®, a comprehensive independent study of the world’s major players in risk and compliance technology, is acknowledged as the go-to for clear, accurate analysis of the risk technology marketplace. With its…

T+1: complacency before the storm?

This paper, created by WatersTechnology in association with Gresham Technologies, outlines what the move to T+1 (next-day settlement) of broker/dealer-executed trades in the US and Canadian markets means for buy-side and sell-side firms

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here