Isda OTC derivatives operations benchmarking survey shows mixed results
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association’s latest over-the-counter derivatives operations benchmarking survey showed an increase in processing speed and automation for standardised products such as vanilla forward rate agreements (FRAs) and swaps, but less progress for more structured instruments such as credit and equity derivatives.
The survey shows an increase in automation, most notable for FRAs and vanilla swaps. “The most common results are either no automation, or substantial automation, suggesting an ‘all or nothing’ approach: that is, once a firm institutes some automation, it applies it widely,” the survey’s authors said.
The responses indicated that front-office trade data errors, usually involving dates, are most common for credit derivatives. Twenty-one percent of these errors relate to credit derivatives, while 10% involve FRAs and 17% involve vanilla swaps.
The survey also reported that confirmation production has slowed for FRAs and for vanilla swaps. New and non-standard products, waiting time for documentation, and approval from legal and compliance areas are to blame, Isda said.
The survey participants reported an average of 803 new OTC trades per week during 2001, up from 689 in last year’s survey. But volumes at large firms decreased from 1,975 trades per week to 1,900; while volumes for small firms nearly tripled at 166 from 57 trades the previous year.
Most respondents expected volumes for products to remain stable or to increase by a maximum of 25% in the next year. The only exception is credit derivatives volumes, which most respondents expected to increase by more than 25%. Firms reported that signed master agreements were in place with more than 92% of counterparties, up from 85% last year.
The survey found that 100% of trade details for FRAs and 98% for vanilla interest rate and currency swaps were available for processing the same day, compared with 77% for credit derivatives and 83% for equity derivatives. In terms of trade confirmation, firms reported that over 90% of vanilla swaps and FRA confirmations were sent out within two days (T+2). But confirmations for credit and equity derivatives were generally slower, with only 48% of credit derivatives and 62% of equity derivatives confirmations being sent out by T+2.
FRAs and vanilla swaps showed a higher level of automation than credit and equity derivatives. Functions with the highest degree of automation included the transfer of front-office trade data to the operations system, the transfer of data from the operations systems to the general ledger and the addition of data to the front-office record. Of respondents that reported no current automation, 69% said they planned future automation for FRAs and 80% said they would automate credit derivatives.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Technology
FX options: rising activity puts post-trade in focus
A surge in electronic FX options trading is among the factors fuelling demand for efficiencies across the entire trade lifecycle, says OSTTRA’s commercial lead, FX and securities
Dismantling the zeal and the hype: the real GenAI use cases in risk management
Chartis explores the advantages and drawbacks of GenAI applications in risk management – firmly within the well-established and continuously evolving AI landscape
Chartis RiskTech100® 2024
The latest iteration of the Chartis RiskTech100®, a comprehensive independent study of the world’s major players in risk and compliance technology, is acknowledged as the go-to for clear, accurate analysis of the risk technology marketplace. With its…
T+1: complacency before the storm?
This paper, created by WatersTechnology in association with Gresham Technologies, outlines what the move to T+1 (next-day settlement) of broker/dealer-executed trades in the US and Canadian markets means for buy-side and sell-side firms
Empowering risk management with AI
This webinar explores how artificial intelligence (AI) can strip out the overheads and effort of rapidly modelling, monitoring and mitigating risk
Core-Payments for business leaders: why real-time access to payment data is key to long‑term business success
Business leaders require easy access to timely, reliable and complete information across post-trade processes. Aside from the usual requirements of senior managers to optimise for risk, revenues and costs, they increasingly need to demonstrate to their…
Risk applications and the cloud: driving better value and performance from key risk management architecture
Today's financial services organisations are increasingly looking to move their financial risk management applications to the cloud. But, according to a recent survey by Risk.net and SS&C Algorithmics, many risk professionals believe there is room for…
Machine learning models: the validation challenge
Machine learning models are seeing increasing demand across the capital markets spectrum. But how can firms improve their chances of gaining internal and regulatory approval for these type of models?