European Union lenders’ probability-of-default (PD) estimates for corporate borrowers fell in Q1 2019 for the third consecutive quarter, regulatory data shows.
The mean average weighted PD for corporate exposures, as gauged by EU banks for counterparties across 39 countries, was 2.24% in Q1 2019, down from 2.26% in the previous quarter and 2.61% a year prior.
The mean average weighted loss-given-default estimate was 35.16%, down from 35.42% on the quarter and 35.28% on the year.
Corporate PDs ranged from 0.6% for Russian counterparties to 11.8% for Greek borrowers. LGD values were lowest for Danish corporates, at 22.15% and highest for Chinese companies, at 47.36%.
Credit risk estimates for retail exposures also edged lower quarter-on-quarter. The mean average weighted PD for these was 2.31% in Q1 2019, down from 3.20% three months prior. However, this was higher than the 2.04% posted in Q1 2018.
The mean average weighted LGD estimate for retail exposures was 26.28%, down from 26.91% in Q4 2018, but up from 25.49% in Q1 2018.
Swedish retail borrowers attracted the lowest average weighted PD estimates, at 0.37%, and Slovakian borrowers the highest, at 15.1%. Retail LGD values were lowest for Maltese debtors, at 9.54%, and highest for Indian debtors, at 52.08%.
What is it?
The European Banking Authority produces quarterly credit risk parameters, based on data provided by EU banks that use internal-ratings based approaches. The disclosure is intended to increase transparency on the default rate, loss rate, PD and LGD of the retail and corporate counterparties of EU banks.
PDs are computed as a weighted average of non-defaulted exposures. Only statistics for countries with more than three banks reporting in that particular country are shown.
Why it matters
Lower PDs and LGDs imply lower regulatory capital charges for credit exposures. All else being equal, therefore, the sinking default estimates mean EU banks will have to hold less cash against the loans they make to corporate and retail borrowers, bolstering their overall lending capacity.
A question mark hangs over the veracity of these credit risk estimates, however. EU banks’ internal ratings-based approach models have come under scrutiny through the targeted review of internal models (Trim), while the EBA found that 39% of surveyed lenders had set IRB capital charges lower than the level suggested by the watchdogs’ own benchmarks.
The average weighted PDs and LGDs may shift in future quarters, therefore, for reasons besides a change in credit conditions, as banks revise their models to bring them in line with EBA and Trim standards.
Get in touch
Sign up to the Risk Quantum daily newsletter to receive the latest data insights
Let us know your thoughts on our latest analysis. You can drop us a line at abdool.bhollah@risk.net, or send a tweet to @RiskQuantum.
Tell me more
Default risks in peripheral eurozone inch up
EU banks slash default risk estimates for corporates by 30%
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk Quantum
Commerzbank wager swells UniCredit’s modelled RWAs by 62.5%
Total return swaps on German shares inflate VAR and SVAR components
Consolidation of Arval exposures adds €20bn to BNP Paribas’ RWAs
Bank shifts exposures from soon-to-be retired equity IRB treatment to standardised approach
Russian loan liquidation lifts RBI’s risk density
Cash parked at sanctioned central bank carries higher capital requirements than original loans
CCPs’ skin in the game drops to historic low
Clearing members bear increasing load, analysis of 15 clearing houses shows
StanChart’s market RWAs hit eight-year high
Client-driven RWA deployment raises market risk exposure by $3.2 billion
Valley National sees surge in delinquent CRE loans in Q3
Bank’s net charge-off rate more than doubles as $114 million in CRE loans become past due
UBS logs three VAR breaches on legacy Credit Suisse positions
Bank risks higher capital charges amid market volatility and exit-related costs
HSBC’s China CRE provisions surge to cover one-fourth of book
Additional reserves and reduced exposure elevate ECL coverage for mainland portfolio