A number of European banks will have to hold funds and eligible liabilities equivalent to 28% of their risk-weighted assets on average, their respective central banks have said.
Beginning in December 2017, Handelsbanken, Nordea, SEB and Swedbank were notified of the new minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) set up by the Single Resolution Board (SRB).
In May, AIB, Banco Sabadell, Bank of Ireland, BBVA, KBC, OP Financial Group, Santander and UniCredit were also informed by their respective central banks, while ING was notified this month.
Handelsbanken was handed the highest requirement at 35.3% of RWAs held as of December 31, 2016, while Banco Sabadell got away with only 22.7%.
Santander’s MREL requirement is 24.35%, KBC’s is 25.9%, Bank of Ireland’s 26.39%, SEB’s 26.9%, OP Financial Group 27.6%, AIB and BBVA’s are 28.04%, Nordea’s 28.9%, ING’s 29.3% and Swedbank’s 34.8%.
The new requirements will come into force in 2020 for Banco Sabadell, BBVA, UniCredit and Santander, while the two Irish banks, AIB and Bank of Ireland, will have to comply 12 months later.
Swedish banks Handelsbanken, Nordea, SEB and Swedbank are already compliant as of January, while OP Financial Group has been in compliance since May. ING was required to meet the requirement upon notification on July 2 and KBC will have to be compliant from May 2019.
When Nordea moves its headquarters from Sweden to Finland later this year, its MREL requirement, which was determined by the Swedish National Debt Office, will be revised by the European Union’s SRB and reset early next year.
What is it?
The MREL requirement has been established to ensure that banks in the EU have sufficient own funds and eligible liabilities to absorb losses in the case of a potential bank failure. It is determined on a per-institution basis.
The Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD) created this requirement to make sure that troubled institutions can recapitalise without having to resort to public funds.
The EU’s SRB, together with national resolution authorities, started assessing banks’ loss-absorbing capacities in 2016. The following year it started developing binding requirements for major banking groups and this year began setting specific targets.
Why it matters
Following a set of amendments by the BRRD, the method for calculating MREL is currently under discussion in a meeting of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission. This means the final requirements could still diverge from those communicated to the banks.
But even if the requirements remained the same, it is not clear why some banks had to comply straight away, while the other banks got two or even three years to meet the standard. The patchwork approach risks an unlevel playing field developing across the single market.
Get in touch
What do you make of these different timings? Do banks have reasons to be happy or upset about it? Let us know your thoughts at alessandro.aimone@infopro-digital.com, @aimoneale or @RiskQuantum.
Tell me more
Nordea plumps bail-in buffers as it moves to Finland
Funding in the dark: EU banks wait on bail-in bond rules
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk Quantum
Commerzbank wager swells UniCredit’s modelled RWAs by 62.5%
Total return swaps on German shares inflate VAR and SVAR components
Consolidation of Arval exposures adds €20bn to BNP Paribas’ RWAs
Bank shifts exposures from soon-to-be retired equity IRB treatment to standardised approach
Russian loan liquidation lifts RBI’s risk density
Cash parked at sanctioned central bank carries higher capital requirements than original loans
CCPs’ skin in the game drops to historic low
Clearing members bear increasing load, analysis of 15 clearing houses shows
StanChart’s market RWAs hit eight-year high
Client-driven RWA deployment raises market risk exposure by $3.2 billion
Valley National sees surge in delinquent CRE loans in Q3
Bank’s net charge-off rate more than doubles as $114 million in CRE loans become past due
UBS logs three VAR breaches on legacy Credit Suisse positions
Bank risks higher capital charges amid market volatility and exit-related costs
HSBC’s China CRE provisions surge to cover one-fourth of book
Additional reserves and reduced exposure elevate ECL coverage for mainland portfolio