Libor trial hears of lead-up to Hayes's dismissal from Citi
Court hears how Tom Hayes’s attempts as a new trader at Citi to fix Libor in his favour resulted in his dismissal from the bank in 2010
In the weeks after he joined Citigroup's Tokyo swaps desk, Tom Hayes enlisted Hayato Hoshino, a yen swaps trader based in London, to "become friendly" with the bank's treasury desk and "casually" request London interbank offered rate (Libor) fixes, London's Southwark Crown Court heard today (June 29).
In interviews with the Serious Fraud Office in 2013, the transcripts of which were read out in court, Hayes said one of his aims when he joined Citi "was to speak to Hoshino" and get him to a point where he could "just wander over to the desk and say 'look, you know, any chance we can move it [Libor] up or down or whatever?'"
Hayes, who is on trial on eight charges of conspiracy to defraud between 2006 and 2010, attempted to strengthen the relationship between the two desks by arranging conference calls and setting up lunches for introductory purposes, the jury heard today.
But the plan was more difficult to execute than he had envisaged. Hayes told the SFO that when he met the team in London in January 2010 and "said to a submitter 'it would be good if you could help us out on Libor sometimes'" the submitter "just smiled and didn't say very much ... And I thought, oh, that wasn't very receptive."
Libor trial: latest updates
Day-by-day coverage of Tom Hayes Libor trial
Hayes joined Citi from UBS – where he had worked since 2006 – on December 3, 2009, but did not start trading until February 2010.
"I sensed the atmosphere was a little bit different about it," he told the SFO, referring to the culture of Citi compared with his time at UBS. "But in terms of controls and rules [about traders talking to submitters], again, they were completely absent."
In an email to Hoshino on December 14, 2009, shown in court today, Hayes asked Hoshino if he regularly talked to the cash desk and if he knew about Libor moves in advance. "If we know ahead of time we can take a position and scalp the market," he said, according to the records.
In another exchange dated March 3, 2010, Hayes explained to Hoshino that he needed lower yen Libor. In convincing Hoshino to approach Citi's yen Libor submitter with the request, he said: "Make sure not to put [it] in writing. Just have a quiet word with him."
In the days that followed that particular conversation, Citi's yen Libor submission did move lower, the defence showed today.
Hayes's senior manager, Christopher Cecere, also pushed for a stronger relationship between Hoshino and the submitters who sat on the treasury desk in London, the court heard today. In an email exchange dated April 27, 2010, Cecere asked Hayes: "Is the tonar [Tokyo overnight average rate]/Libor trade you have widening at all?" Hayes responded: "I doubt it will. Citi moved us higher. I wish those guys would tell us what they plan to do," in reference to the day's Libor fix. To this, Cecere said: "Hoshino needs better dialogue with them."
The efforts to make Hoshino more assertive ended up backfiring on Hayes, however. When Hoshino relayed an explicit request from Hayes to London-based Burak Celtik, the yen Libor submitter, to move Libor up on June 25, 2010, it triggered an internal investigation culminating in Hayes's dismissal.
Following a series of internal interviews during July and August, Hayes emailed his boss on August 20, 2010: "As you are aware, until this week there has been no internal rule or policy surrounding this practice [contact between traders and submitters] and therefore I'm not really sure why I am repeatedly being dragged off the desk to discuss this."
The termination notice, shown to the court today, stated that Hayes's attempts to manipulate the yen Libor and Tibor (Tokyo interbank offered rate) rates to suit his trading position were in "clear violation" of Citi's code of conduct, which Hayes signed upon his arrival at the bank in December 2009, and "may violate the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act of Japan, the Antitrust Act of Japan and other applicable rules and regulations".
The jury was today also shown Hayes's written response to the notice, drafted on September 9, 2010, in which he stated that his actions were "entirely consistent" with those of others. "Senior management at CGMJ [Citigroup Global Markets Japan] were aware of my actions and at no point was I told that my actions could or would constitute any wrongdoing."
The trial continues.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Operational risk
Integrated GRC solutions 2024: market update and vendor landscape
In the face of persistent digitisation challenges and the attendant transformation in business practices, many firms have been struggling to maintain governance and business continuity
Vendor spotlight: Dixtior AML transaction monitoring solutions
The Chartis Research report, AML transaction monitoring solutions, considers how, by working together, financial institutions, vendors and regulators can create more effective anti-money laundering (AML) systems.
Financial crime and compliance50 2024
The detailed analysis for the Financial crime and compliance50 considers firms’ technological advances and strategic direction to provide a complete view of how market leaders are driving transformation in this sector
Automating regulatory compliance and reporting
Flaws in the regulation of the banking sector have been addressed initially by Basel III, implemented last year. Financial institutions can comply with capital and liquidity requirements in a natively integrated yet modular environment by utilising…
Investment banks: the future of risk control
This Risk.net survey report explores the current state of risk controls in investment banks, the challenges of effective engagement across the three lines of defence, and the opportunity to develop a more dynamic approach to first-line risk control
Op risk outlook 2022: the legal perspective
Christoph Kurth, partner of the global financial institutions leadership team at Baker McKenzie, discusses the key themes emerging from Risk.net’s Top 10 op risks 2022 survey and how financial firms can better manage and mitigate the impact of…
Emerging trends in op risk
Karen Man, partner and member of the global financial institutions leadership team at Baker McKenzie, discusses emerging op risks in the wake of the Covid‑19 pandemic, a rise in cyber attacks, concerns around conduct and culture, and the complexities of…
Moving targets: the new rules of conduct risk
How are capital markets firms adapting their approaches to monitoring and managing conduct risk following the Covid‑19 pandemic? In a Risk.net webinar in association with NICE Actimize, the panel discusses changing regulatory requirements, the essentials…