Basel II Pillar II guidance issued by US regulators

US regulators jointly issue supervisory review process of capital adequacy (pillar 2) related to the implementation of the Basel II advanced capital framework.

WASHINGTON, DC – The US federal bank and thrift regulatory agencies have jointly issued final guidance on the Supervisory Review Process of Capital Adequacy (Pillar 2) under the Basel II advanced capital framework. This guidance provides the clarification necessary to support the implementation of the advanced approaches final rule. The final guidance takes effect on September 2, 2008.

This guidance only applies to banking organisations that use the advanced approaches final rule to calculate their risk-based capital requirements. In general, the guidance focuses on three areas: the comprehensive supervisory review of capital adequacy; compliance with regulatory capital requirements, and the internal capital adequacy assessment process (ICAAP).

It also highlights the fundamental objectives of a sound ICAAP, which are: identifying and measuring material risks, setting and assessing internal capital adequacy goals that relate directly to risk, and ensuring the integrity of internal capital adequacy assessments. Capital must meet or exceed regulatory minimum requirements, regardless of ICAAP results.

The guidance also supports the agencies' existing ability to intervene when necessary to prevent an individual bank's regulatory capital from falling below the level needed to support all material risks to which the bank is exposed.

This guidance neither supersedes nor alters the functioning of the Prompt Corrective Action or leverage capital requirements.

Click here to access the document.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Financial crime and compliance50 2024

The detailed analysis for the Financial crime and compliance50 considers firms’ technological advances and strategic direction to provide a complete view of how market leaders are driving transformation in this sector

Investment banks: the future of risk control

This Risk.net survey report explores the current state of risk controls in investment banks, the challenges of effective engagement across the three lines of defence, and the opportunity to develop a more dynamic approach to first-line risk control

Op risk outlook 2022: the legal perspective

Christoph Kurth, partner of the global financial institutions leadership team at Baker McKenzie, discusses the key themes emerging from Risk.net’s Top 10 op risks 2022 survey and how financial firms can better manage and mitigate the impact of…

Emerging trends in op risk

Karen Man, partner and member of the global financial institutions leadership team at Baker McKenzie, discusses emerging op risks in the wake of the Covid‑19 pandemic, a rise in cyber attacks, concerns around conduct and culture, and the complexities of…

Moving targets: the new rules of conduct risk

How are capital markets firms adapting their approaches to monitoring and managing conduct risk following the Covid‑19 pandemic? In a Risk.net webinar in association with NICE Actimize, the panel discusses changing regulatory requirements, the essentials…

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here