Same-day affirmation could save €200m a year
Brussels debate highlights misalignment of incentives as reason behind lack of automation
LONDON/BRUSSELS – A new report shows that automation of the trade verification process improves settlement performance for securities firms in Europe and reduces operational costs and risks, with benefits to end-investors.
The Omgeo-commissioned report by Oxera, a European independent economics consultancy, and Omgeo, was launched at an event in Brussels where leading industry figures discussed the findings and examined how increased efficiencies in the middle office play a crucial role in making Europe a more competitive financial market-place.
The key findings of the report included: automated same-day affirmation (SDA) processes lead to reduced operational risk and improved settlement: settlement failure rates for clients with automated trade verification processes can be as much as 50% lower than for non-automated clients; operating costs are reduced through automated SDA as it allows a larger volume of trades to be processed without a corresponding increase in costs – mainly middle-office staff – and risk. Efficiency gains from adopting automated SDA also translates into lower transaction costs for end-investors, and the benefits are enhanced through the market-wide adoption of SDA, according to the report. It also states that trade verification and SDA should be part of European policy debate, and that there are a number of ongoing initiatives aimed at building efficiencies in the European post-trade landscape. The report concludes that trade verification, and how to improve this process by working towards automated SDA, should form part of the policy debate.
Commenting on the report findings, Simon Haggerty, managing director, UBS, said: “Same-day affirmation is arguably the single most important initiative to progress cross-border securities' productivity and risk management. Oxera's paper provides timely focus on this topic. By representing the financial benefits of SDA to the market so clearly, it provides a compelling logic for all manual parties to automate. I welcome the debate, in regards to how best we can move the European market forward in this space.” “UBS still dispatches several million fax confirmations a year. In our experience, trades with such non-automated clients have a settlement failure rate twice as high compared to our automated clients,” he added.
Leonie Bell, managing consultant at Oxera, said: “The trade verification process is still conducted manually by many market participants in Europe, in particular on the buy side, and there is currently no uniform practice and often not even a target to complete the process and affirm trades on trade day.
“Our research suggests firms adopting automation to achieve SDA can expect significant reductions in the risks and costs associated with trade verification and other post-trading processes, and an improved settlement performance. There are also further benefits for other parties in the value chain. Given these findings, the question is what steps should be taken for the market to realise maximum benefits.”
Marianne Brown, president and CEO of Omgeo, said: “This report by Oxera shines a light on a critical, but previously overlooked, part of the trade lifecycle. Much focus has been given to the pre-trade/trade space with Mifid, and to the back end of the trade lifecycle with clearing and settlement, but the middle-office trade verification process, which provides a vital link between the front and back office, has to date, been ignored.
“This report highlights the dangers to the industry in terms of risk and cost of not adopting automation of trade verification and SDA, particularly in times of market turmoil as we are experiencing currently. We hope these findings will create a call to action and bring this issue to the fore of the European policy agenda in order to create a more efficient community in Europe.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Operational risk
Integrated GRC solutions 2024: market update and vendor landscape
In the face of persistent digitisation challenges and the attendant transformation in business practices, many firms have been struggling to maintain governance and business continuity
Vendor spotlight: Dixtior AML transaction monitoring solutions
The Chartis Research report, AML transaction monitoring solutions, considers how, by working together, financial institutions, vendors and regulators can create more effective anti-money laundering (AML) systems.
Financial crime and compliance50 2024
The detailed analysis for the Financial crime and compliance50 considers firms’ technological advances and strategic direction to provide a complete view of how market leaders are driving transformation in this sector
Automating regulatory compliance and reporting
Flaws in the regulation of the banking sector have been addressed initially by Basel III, implemented last year. Financial institutions can comply with capital and liquidity requirements in a natively integrated yet modular environment by utilising…
Investment banks: the future of risk control
This Risk.net survey report explores the current state of risk controls in investment banks, the challenges of effective engagement across the three lines of defence, and the opportunity to develop a more dynamic approach to first-line risk control
Op risk outlook 2022: the legal perspective
Christoph Kurth, partner of the global financial institutions leadership team at Baker McKenzie, discusses the key themes emerging from Risk.net’s Top 10 op risks 2022 survey and how financial firms can better manage and mitigate the impact of…
Emerging trends in op risk
Karen Man, partner and member of the global financial institutions leadership team at Baker McKenzie, discusses emerging op risks in the wake of the Covid‑19 pandemic, a rise in cyber attacks, concerns around conduct and culture, and the complexities of…
Moving targets: the new rules of conduct risk
How are capital markets firms adapting their approaches to monitoring and managing conduct risk following the Covid‑19 pandemic? In a Risk.net webinar in association with NICE Actimize, the panel discusses changing regulatory requirements, the essentials…