Top dealers slash equity exposures in Q2
The majority of the world’s largest market risk-takers slashed their equity market exposures during the second quarter of 2006, as they responded forcefully to sharp spikes in equity volatility in late May and early June.
“After the buoyant equity markets seen at the end of [the] first quarter, sentiment turned negative in the middle of [the] second quarter,” says UBS in its second quarter financial results statement. “Our equity exposure was reduced as we actively managed exposure to falling equity markets and some proprietary positions in merger and acquisition stocks were closed.”
The situation was similar at JP Morgan Chase, which cut its period-end equities VAR (1-day, 99% confidence) to $21 million compared with $46 million for the end of the second quarter of 2005 – a 54% decline year-on-year. Accounting for its overall decrease in second quarter VAR, the dealer said in its 10-Q: “The decrease was driven by declines in both fixed income and equities offset by higher VAR for commodities.”
JP Morgan’s second quarter average VAR fell to $24 million compared with $45 million in 2005 and $32 million average for the first quarter of 2005. But its quarter-end VAR was only down $2 million, or 8.7% compared with its end of first quarter VAR of $23 million.
The reduction at Citigroup was much more muted. Its June 30 equities VAR (1-day, 99%) fell just 4.6% to $41 million compared with $43 million at the end of March this year.
The situation was markedly different at Goldman Sachs. The US dealer saw its average second quarter equities VAR (1-day, 95%) rise by 219% from $26 million in 2005 to $83 million this year. Goldman Sachs’ equities VAR at the end of its second quarter stood at $100 million, compared with $57 million at the end of the same period in 2005.
However, Goldman Sachs reported its second quarter financial results on May 31, a month earlier than the commercial banks, so its results might not necessarily reflect actions taken in response to the sharp rises in volatility.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Market risk
Market risk solutions 2023: market and vendor landscape
A Chartis Research report that examines the structural shifts in enterprise risk systems and the impact of regulations, as well as the available technology.
The new rules of market risk management
Amid 2020’s Covid-19-related market turmoil – with volatility and value-at-risk (VAR) measures soaring – some of the world’s largest investment banks took advantage of the extraordinary conditions to notch up record trading revenues. In a recent Risk.net…
ETF strategies to manage market volatility
Money managers and institutional investors are re-evaluating investment strategies in the face of rapidly shifting market conditions. Consequently, selective genres of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are seeing robust growth in assets. Hong Kong Exchanges…
FRTB spurs data mining push at StanChart
Bank building “single golden source” of trade data in a bid to lower NMRF burden
Asian privacy laws obstruct FRTB data pooling efforts
Bank scepticism and regulatory hurdles likely to inhibit cross-border information sharing
Seizing the opportunity of transformational change
Sponsored Q&A: CompatibL, Murex and Numerix
Doubts grow over US FRTB implementation
Fragmented roll-out would price European banks “out of the market”
Basel group shake-up has banks hoping for FRTB changes
Barger and Durand replaced by BoE's Nesbitt; banks want fresh look at P&L test