Revised CVA capital charge continues to worry dealers

Finalised by the Basel Committee in December, a capital charge for credit value adjustment (CVA) will have a significant impact on major derivatives dealers. But risk managers argue the revised charge is not risk-sensitive enough and fails to reflect the diversity of approaches to CVA. Mark Pengelly reports

riccardo-rebonato

Bankers breathed a sigh of relief in December, when the publication of the final text of Basel III confirmed what many already suspected – the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision had accepted its original proposals for a credit value adjustment (CVA) capital charge were too onerous and had decided to make significant changes. The revised measures have been welcomed as a vast improvement that better reflect bank CVA exposures. But many participants remain uneasy, and claim further changes are

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Credit risk & modelling – Special report 2021

This Risk special report provides an insight on the challenges facing banks in measuring and mitigating credit risk in the current environment, and the strategies they are deploying to adapt to a more stringent regulatory approach.

The wild world of credit models

The Covid-19 pandemic has induced a kind of schizophrenia in loan-loss models. When the pandemic hit, banks overprovisioned for credit losses on the assumption that the economy would head south. But when government stimulus packages put wads of cash in…

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here