European CDS dealers to follow US to fixed coupons
An agreement between the major dealers to move to standardised fixed coupons for trading European credit default swaps (CDSs), following a similar move in North America, could speed global moves towards central clearing, say market participants.
The dealers - believed to include Barclays Capital, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley and UBS - reached an agreement on April 17 to trade European CDSs with standardised coupons of 25, 100, 500 or 1,000 basis points, with a provisional target set at the end of June. The International Swaps and Derivatives Association could not be reached to confirm the move, but a leading dealer confirmed it was a binding arrangement.
"The changes will apply to all new CDS contracts originated in Europe," John Cortese, head of European high-yield trading at Barclays Capital in London, told Risk News. "The use of fixed coupons will make CDSs easier to clear on a central platform, because you have greater fungibility and standardisation, rather than a variety of different coupons outstanding."
The agreement follows the introduction of a number of changes to the global CDS market on April 8, collectively known as the 'big bang' protocol. The protocol hardwires the auction settlement mechanism into contracts, introduces five regional determinations committees to decide whether credit or succession events have occurred, and implements rolling look-back periods of 60-90 days from the current day for the protection provided by a CDS.
Alongside the big bang protocol, North American CDSs were also adapted on April 8 to exclude modified restructuring as a credit event and introduce fixed coupons of 100bp or 500bp to be paid on a quarterly basis. "The move to fixed coupons makes the single-name market more like the index market," said Jason Quinn, co-head of high-grade/high-yield flow trading at Barclays Capital in New York. "It makes them more fungible, more index-like and more bond-like, so they're more like standard instruments and more easily cleared."
Both the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the European Commission have been pushing dealers to use central clearing platforms (CCPs) as a risk mitigant, but new research published in the US this week suggests a CCP might not be the panacea some have suggested.
Darrell Duffie, professor of finance at Stanford Graduate School of Business, and doctoral student Haoxiang Zhu argue that adding a CCP for one class of derivatives can actually reduce netting efficiency and lead to an increase in collateral demands and exposure to counterparty default.
They also suggest adding multiple CCPs in Europe and the US could be damaging. "Whenever it is efficient to introduce a CCP, it cannot be efficient to introduce more than one CCP for the same class of derivatives," the academics noted.See also: Ups and Downs
CDS 'big bang' could see 18% increase in tear-ups, Markit says
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Credit risk
Credit risk management solutions 2024: market update and vendor landscape
A Chartis report outlining the view of the market and vendor landscape for credit risk management solutions in the trading and banking books
Finding the investment management ‘one analytics view’
This paper outlines the benefits accruing to buy-side practitioners on the back of generating a single analytics view of their risk and performance metrics across funds, regions and asset classes
Revolutionising liquidity management: harnessing operational intelligence for real‑time insights and risk mitigation
Pierre Gaudin, head of business development at ActiveViam, explains the importance of fast, in-memory data analysis functions in allowing firms to consistently provide senior decision-makers with actionable insights
Sec-lending haircuts and indemnification pricing
A pricing method for borrowed securities that includes haircut and indemnification is introduced
XVAs and counterparty credit risk for energy markets: addressing the challenges and unravelling complexity
In this webinar, a panel of quantitative researchers and risk practitioners from banks, energy firms and a software vendor discuss practical challenges in the modelling and risk management of XVAs and CCR in the energy markets, and how to overcome them.
Credit risk & modelling – Special report 2021
This Risk special report provides an insight on the challenges facing banks in measuring and mitigating credit risk in the current environment, and the strategies they are deploying to adapt to a more stringent regulatory approach.
The wild world of credit models
The Covid-19 pandemic has induced a kind of schizophrenia in loan-loss models. When the pandemic hit, banks overprovisioned for credit losses on the assumption that the economy would head south. But when government stimulus packages put wads of cash in…
Driving greater value in credit risk and modelling
A forum of industry leaders discusses the challenges facing banks in measuring and mitigating credit risk in the current environment, and strategies to adapt to a more stringent regulatory framework in the future