Bloating CCP default funds. New margin models. Are the two linked?

Dealers grumble that greater guaranty fund payments could undermine the ‘defaulter pays’ principle of clearing

What clearing houses giveth with one hand, they taketh away with the other – or so banks are finding. The shift to new margin models for futures and options promises savings for some derivatives users, but dealers are concerned that greater default fund payments could outweigh any such reductions.

These worries may be justified. Contributions by big dealers to the default funds of central counterparties (CCPs) swelled by a cumulative $14 billion in the first half of last year.

Morgan Stanley’s

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

The changing shape of risk

S&P Global Market Intelligence’s head of credit and risk solutions reveals how firms are adjusting their strategies and capabilities to embrace a more holistic view of risk

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here