Banks fear more trades will be caught in NMRF trap

“Many risk factors now will essentially look like NMRFs,” says a risk manager at a North American bank

growing dollar costs
Annex D in Basel’s consultation states the use of proxy data “must be limited”

Banks are concerned that proposed amendments to the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book could increase the number of extraneous risk factors they are expected to capitalise outside their models – potentially loading more costly add-ons onto already inflated market risk capital charges.

Market participants’ anxiety over a potential increase in non-modellable risk factors (NMRFs) stem from an appendix included in the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s recent consultation on amendments to

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

The changing shape of risk

S&P Global Market Intelligence’s head of credit and risk solutions reveals how firms are adjusting their strategies and capabilities to embrace a more holistic view of risk

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here