
Pillar 2 moves to centre stage for op risk capital
US banks set for sharp falls in Pillar 1 requirements, but regulator-set add-ons cloud SMA’s impact

The transatlantic divide that exists between US and European banks on expected changes in operational risk capital under Basel III could be smaller than it first appeared. While European banks in general will likely see an increase in their capital requirements, and US banks a decrease, the differences may be offset at least in part by Pillar 2 adjustments.
For European banks tipped to see a
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Swaps or futures? Clearers grapple with CME’s event contracts
New prediction contracts straddle the line between futures and swaps, Risk.net understands
Stress-testing for a new age of banking
Banks are using stress-testing to fulfil supervisory requirements and inform strategic decision-making
Banks treat ERM as compulsory – even when it isn’t
More than 80% follow supervisory guidance or expectations for ERM, benchmarking shows
Enterprise risk managers: police or foot soldiers?
With more than 5,000 data points from 37 banks, our first ERM Benchmarking exercise shines a light on very different missions
CME mystery FCM’s purpose revealed
F&O Financial revealed as non-clearing broker for new event contracts venture with FanDuel
When AI models malfunction, address the problem not the math
Governance of artificial intelligence models should focus on actionable outcomes rather than interpretability, argues former chief regulator
Some European banks still failing net interest income test
Swedbank joins seven other outliers after it updates methodology assumptions
Ice’s VAR migration reignites debate on margin levels
CCP says IRM 2 is more sensitive to portfolio risk, but banks fear increased risk to clearing members