![Risk.net](https://www.risk.net/sites/default/files/styles/print_logo/public/2018-09/print-logo.png?itok=1TpHrpuP)
IMF wrong to label Deutsche world’s riskiest bank, says economist
Co-developer of risk methodology used by IMF says it misapplied it when labelling bank riskiest G-Sib
![stopping systemic risk stopping systemic risk](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/2017-11/stopping-systemic-risk.jpg.webp?h=63136e89&itok=OZSNf9s6)
The International Monetary Fund erred in labelling Deutsche Bank the biggest contributor to systemic risk among large banks, says the economist who co-developed the methodology the fund employed. Kamil Yilmaz, of Koç University in Turkey, now claims it was incorrectly applied.
In its financial system stability assessment for Germany in June 2016, the IMF stated Allianz was the largest contributor to systemic risk in Germany, and that “among global systemically important banks (G-Sibs), Deutsche
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
During Trump turbulence, value-at-risk may go pop
Trading risk models have been trained in quiet markets, and volatility is now looming
Osttra to launch Treasury clearing middleware
Mid-year delivery expected for system that aids credit checking for repo trades
Banks divided over CME’s done-away model for UST clearing
Buy side could give thumbs-up if questions on margin protection and guarantee fees are answered
Why JP Morgan’s Santos wants to make bad news travel fast
Asset management CRO says sharing information early holds the key to avoiding surprises
Mitigating model risk in AI
Advancing a model risk management framework for AI/machine learning models at financial institutions
BoE warns over risk of system-wide cyber attack
Senior policy official Carolyn Wilkins also expresses concern over global fragmentation of bank regulation
Treasury clearing timeline ‘too aggressive’ says BofA rates head
Sifma gears up for extension talks with incoming SEC and Treasury officials
Strengthening technology resilience and risk controls against multidomain disruption
The consequences of multidomain disruption and best practice strategies to enhance digital resilience