![Risk.net](https://www.risk.net/sites/default/files/styles/print_logo/public/2018-09/print-logo.png?itok=1TpHrpuP)
What the ambitions of China’s banks mean for Hong Kong
Political war of words over former colony means little; it’s the appetite of mainland banks for local dominance rivals should watch
Two decades after Britain handed Hong Kong back to Beijing, global banks that have pinned their future strategy on Asia are right to be wary of the international aspirations of China’s financial institutions.
China’s president, Xi Jinping, paid a visit to Hong Kong on July 1 to mark the twentieth anniversary of the handover – and left no doubt as to who was in charge. In a speech that took aim at pro-democracy campaigners, Jinping said the relationship between Hong Kong and the central government in Beijing should be governed by the principle of ‘one country’. Any attempt to challenge this “is absolutely impermissible”, he added.
China has enjoyed a remarkable economic transformation over the past two decades, with the country’s largest banks aggressively expanding abroad. But within these widely acknowledged themes lie a couple of nuances that global banks would do well to pay heed to.
One is the sheer speed with which China’s more savvy banking behemoths are mastering complex risk management challenges that their global peers have spent decades dealing with through trial and error.
With the pinch of anxiety creeping into his voice, one senior risk manager within the global markets division of an international bank said that these days it is not unusual for one Chinese bank to increase headcount by up to 300 just to tackle a single issue. A good handful of these recruits will already have experience working at a global bank.
For example, the use of risk premia to drive better investment returns has been receiving a lot of attention from Chinese banks, with industry sources reporting that large amounts of money have been pouring into the development of sophisticated in-house quantitative strategies at several of China’s megabanks.
But this emerging sophistication is not confined to the top-tier banks. Smaller players are also revamping their risk management systems to better serve their clients. For the time being, many of these players are content to position themselves to capture cross-border trade flows from the motherland. This largely means establishing operations in Hong Kong and getting a better handle on their credit risk exposure.
But it might not be long until, flush with their success in Hong Kong and brand new risk management frameworks, these banks will be ready to take on the rest of Asia, leeching market share from established players.
“Global banks are right to be worried,” says a senior risk manager from one of these mid-sized Chinese banks. “For the past 20 years, the Hong Kong market has been the stronghold [of foreign banks in Asia] and now the Chinese are threatening this. At the same time, the market share of foreign banks in China still remains minimal.”
The China of today is all but unrecognisable from the China that, 20 years ago, took back control of the small British colony of Hong Kong. Those global banks that want to continue to thrive in the evolving Asian landscape need to understand what the China of tomorrow will look like.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Our take
Can history resolve factor investors’ p-hacking questions?
Quants seek reassurance in the far distant past
Insurance double-hatters like Apollo can expect more scrutiny
Regulators are homing in on conflicts of interests at private-equity-owned insurers
Podcast: Lorenzo Ravagli on why the skew is for the many
JP Morgan quant proposes a unified framework for trading the volatility skew premium
Quants see promise in DeBerta’s untangled reading
Improved language models are able to grasp context better
Counterparty risk model links defaults to portfolio values
Fed’s Michael Pykhtin proposes using copula models to capture effects of margin calls on default risk
Does Basel’s internal loss multiplier add up?
As US agencies mull capital reforms, one regulator questions past losses as an indicator of future op risk
Is JSCC-CFTC stalemate about to be broken?
Japan CCP gains allies in battle to clear yen swaps for US clients, but CFTC shakeup could dash hopes
What T+1 risk? Dealers shake off FX concerns
Predictions of increased settlement risk and later-in-the-day trading have yet to materialise